REFERENCES
1. Jin, P.; Jan, L. Y.; Jan, Y. N. Mechanosensitive ion channels: structural features relevant to mechanotransduction mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 43, 207-29.
2. Beaulieu-Laroche, L.; Christin, M.; Donoghue, A.; et al. TACAN is an ion channel involved in sensing mechanical pain. Cell 2020, 180, 956-967.e17.
3. Kefauver, J. M.; Ward, A. B.; Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nature 2020, 587, 567-76.
4. Sukharev, S. I.; Blount, P.; Martinac, B.; Blattner, F. R.; Kung, C. A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E. coli encoded by mscL alone. Nature 1994, 368, 265-8.
5. Coste, B.; Mathur, J.; Schmidt, M.; et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 2010, 330, 55-60.
6. Nilius, B.; Owsianik, G. The transient receptor potential family of ion channels. Genome. Biol. 2011, 12, 218.
7. Renigunta, V.; Schlichthörl, G.; Daut, J. Much more than a leak: structure and function of K2p-channels. Pflugers. Arch. 2015, 467, 867-94.
8. Murthy, S. E.; Dubin, A. E.; Whitwam, T.; et al. OSCA/TMEM63 are an evolutionarily conserved family of mechanically activated ion channels. Elife 2018, 7.
9. Zhang, M.; Shan, Y.; Cox, C. D.; Pei, D. A mechanical-coupling mechanism in OSCA/TMEM63 channel mechanosensitivity. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3943.
11. Lan, W. J.; Holden, D. A.; White, H. S. Pressure-dependent ion current rectification in conical-shaped glass nanopores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13300-3.
12. Jiang, X.; Zhao, C.; Noh, Y.; et al. Nonlinear electrohydrodynamic ion transport in graphene nanopores. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabj2510.
13. Marcotte, A.; Mouterde, T.; Niguès, A.; Siria, A.; Bocquet, L. Mechanically activated ionic transport across single-digit carbon nanotubes. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 1057-61.
14. Wang, M.; Meng, H.; Wang, D.; et al. Dynamic curvature nanochannel-based membrane with anomalous ionic transport behaviors and reversible rectification switch. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1805130.
15. Davis, S. J.; Macha, M.; Chernev, A.; Huang, D. M.; Radenovic, A.; Marion, S. Pressure-induced enlargement and ionic current rectification in symmetric nanopores. Nano. Lett. 2020, 20, 8089-95.
16. Sato, K.; Sasaki, R.; Matsuda, R.; et al. Supramolecular mechanosensitive potassium channel formed by fluorinated amphiphilic cyclophane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 11802-9.
17. Zheng, H.; Li, H.; Li, M.; et al. A Membrane tension-responsive mechanosensitive DNA nanomachine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202305896.
18. Li, C.; Liu, P.; Zhi, Y.; et al. Ultra-mechanosensitive chloride ion transport through bioinspired high-density elastomeric nanochannels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 19098-106.
19. Wu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Chen, Y.; et al. Mechanosensitive and pH-gated butterfly-shaped artificial ion channel for high-selective K+ transport and cancer cell apoptosis. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2416852.
20. Ranade, S. S.; Syeda, R.; Patapoutian, A. Mechanically activated ion channels. Neuron 2015, 87, 1162-79.
21. Kung, C.; Martinac, B.; Sukharev, S. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64, 313-29.
22. Cox, C. D.; Bavi, N.; Martinac, B. Bacterial mechanosensors. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2018, 80, 71-93.
23. Kapsalis, C.; Wang, B.; El Mkami, H.; et al. Allosteric activation of an ion channel triggered by modification of mechanosensitive nano-pockets. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4619.
24. Chang, G.; Spencer, R. H.; Lee, A. T.; Barclay, M. T.; Rees, D. C. Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science 1998, 282, 2220-6.
25. Levina, N.; Tötemeyer, S.; Stokes, N. R.; Louis, P.; Jones, M. A.; Booth, I. R. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO. J. 1999, 18, 1730-7.
26. Bass, R. B.; Strop, P.; Barclay, M.; Rees, D. C. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltage-modulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science 2002, 298, 1582-7.
27. Flegler, V. J.; Rasmussen, T.; Böttcher, B. How functional lipids affect the structure and gating of mechanosensitive MscS-like channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15071.
28. Pliotas, C.; Dahl, A. C.; Rasmussen, T.; et al. The role of lipids in mechanosensation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015, 22, 991-8.
29. Steinbacher, S.; Bass, R.; Strop, P.; Rees, D. C. Structures of the prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels MscL and MscS. In Current Topics in Membranes, Vol. 58; Academic Press, 2007; pp 1-24.
30. Rasmussen, T.; Flegler, V. J.; Rasmussen, A.; Böttcher, B. Structure of the mechanosensitive channel MscS embedded in the membrane bilayer. J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 3081-90.
31. Reddy, B.; Bavi, N.; Lu, A.; Park, Y.; Perozo, E. Molecular basis of force-from-lipids gating in the mechanosensitive channel MscS. Elife 2019, 8.
32. Fang, X. Z.; Zhou, T.; Xu, J. Q.; et al. Structure, kinetic properties and biological function of mechanosensitive Piezo channels. Cell. Biosci. 2021, 11, 13.
33. Alper, S. L. Genetic diseases of PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 dysfunction. Curr. Top. Membr. 2017, 79, 97-134.
34. Saotome, K.; Murthy, S. E.; Kefauver, J. M.; Whitwam, T.; Patapoutian, A.; Ward, A. B. Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature 2018, 554, 481-6.
35. Ge, J.; Li, W.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature 2015, 527, 64-9.
36. Zhao, Q.; Zhou, H.; Chi, S.; et al. Structure and mechanogating mechanism of the Piezo1 channel. Nature 2018, 554, 487-92.
37. Jiang, Y.; Yang, X.; Jiang, J.; Xiao, B. Structural designs and mechanogating mechanisms of the mechanosensitive Piezo channels. Trends. Biochem. Sci. 2021, 46, 472-88.
38. Guo, Y. R.; MacKinnon, R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife 2017, 6, e33660.
39. Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, M.; et al. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature 2019, 573, 225-9.
40. Chesler, A. T.; Szczot, M.; Bharucha-Goebel, D.; et al. The role of PIEZO2 in human mechanosensation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1355-64.
41. Ranade, S. S.; Woo, S. H.; Dubin, A. E.; et al. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice. Nature 2014, 516, 121-5.
42. Gnanasambandam, R.; Bae, C.; Gottlieb, P. A.; Sachs, F. Ionic selectivity and permeation properties of human PIEZO1 channels. PLoS. ONE. 2015, 10, e0125503.
43. Liu, S.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; et al. An intermediate open structure reveals the gating transition of the mechanically activated PIEZO1 channel. Neuron 2025, 113, 590-604.e6.
44. Zhou, Z.; Martinac, B. Mechanisms of PIEZO channel inactivation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14113.
45. Poole, K.; Herget, R.; Lapatsina, L.; Ngo, H. D.; Lewin, G. R. Tuning Piezo ion channels to detect molecular-scale movements relevant for fine touch. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3520.
46. Bae, C.; Sachs, F.; Gottlieb, P. A. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 is inhibited by the peptide GsMTx4. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 6295-300.
47. Startek, J. B.; Boonen, B.; Talavera, K.; Meseguer, V. TRP channels as sensors of chemically-induced changes in cell membrane mechanical properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 371.
49. Arnadóttir, J.; Chalfie, M. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 39, 111-37.
50. Moparthi, L.; Zygmunt, P. M. Human TRPA1 is an inherently mechanosensitive bilayer-gated ion channel. Cell. Calcium. 2020, 91, 102255.
51. Stanley, S. A.; Kelly, L.; Latcha, K. N.; et al. Bidirectional electromagnetic control of the hypothalamus regulates feeding and metabolism. Nature 2016, 531, 647-50.
52. Servin-Vences, M. R.; Moroni, M.; Lewin, G. R.; Poole, K. Direct measurement of TRPV4 and PIEZO1 activity reveals multiple mechanotransduction pathways in chondrocytes. Elife 2017, 6, e21074.
53. Zheng, W.; Holt, J. R. The Mechanosensory Transduction machinery in inner ear hair Cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2021, 50, 31-51.
54. Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, G.; et al. The push-to-open mechanism of the tethered mechanosensitive ion channel NompC. Elife 2021, 10, e58388.
55. Brohawn, S. G.; Su, Z.; MacKinnon, R. Mechanosensitivity is mediated directly by the lipid membrane in TRAAK and TREK1 K+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 3614-9.
56. Brohawn, S. G. How ion channels sense mechanical force: insights from mechanosensitive K2P channels TRAAK, TREK1, and TREK2. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1352, 20-32.
57. Schmidpeter, P. A. M. Petroff JT, 2. N. D.; Khajoueinejad, L.; et al. Membrane phospholipids control gating of the mechanosensitive potassium leak channel TREK1. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1077.
58. Natale, A. M.; Deal, P. E.; Minor DL, J. R. Structural insights into the mechanisms and pharmacology of K2P potassium channels. J. Mol. Biol. 2021, 433, 166995.
59. Ávalos Prado, P.; Chassot, A. A.; Landra-Willm, A.; Sandoz, G. Regulation of two-pore-domain potassium TREK channels and their involvement in pain perception and migraine. Neurosci. Lett. 2022, 773, 136494.
60. Brohawn, S. G.; del Mármol, J.; MacKinnon, R. Crystal structure of the human K2P TRAAK, a lipid- and mechano-sensitive K+ ion channel. Science 2012, 335, 436-41.
61. Dong, Y. Y.; Pike, A. C.; Mackenzie, A.; et al. K2P channel gating mechanisms revealed by structures of TREK-2 and a complex with Prozac. Science 2015, 347, 1256-9.
62. Aryal, P.; Jarerattanachat, V.; Clausen, M. V.; et al. Bilayer-mediated structural transitions control mechanosensitivity of the TREK-2 K2P channel. Structure 2017, 25, 708-718.e2.
63. Sorum, B.; Docter, T.; Panico, V.; Rietmeijer, R. A.; Brohawn, S. G. Tension activation of mechanosensitive two-pore domain K+ channels TRAAK, TREK-1, and TREK-2. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3142.
64. Miller, A. N.; Long, S. B. Crystal structure of the human two-pore domain potassium channel K2P1. Science 2012, 335, 432-6.
65. Lolicato, M.; Arrigoni, C.; Mori, T.; et al. K2P2.1 (TREK-1)-activator complexes reveal a cryptic selectivity filter binding site. Nature 2017, 547, 364-8.
66. Zheng, W.; Rawson, S.; Shen, Z.; et al. TMEM63 proteins function as monomeric high-threshold mechanosensitive ion channels. Neuron 2023, 111, 3195-3210.e7.
67. Yuan, F.; Yang, H.; Xue, Y.; et al. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 2014, 514, 367-71.
68. Chen, G. L.; Li, J. Y.; Chen, X.; et al. Mechanosensitive channels TMEM63A and TMEM63B mediate lung inflation-induced surfactant secretion. J. Clin. Invest. 2024, 134, e174508.
69. Du, H.; Ye, C.; Wu, D.; et al. The cation channel TMEM63B is an osmosensor required for hearing. Cell. Rep. 2020, 31, 107596.
70. Yan, H.; Helman, G.; Murthy, S. E.; et al. Heterozygous variants in the mechanosensitive ion channel TMEM63A result in transient hypomyelination during infancy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 105, 996-1004.
71. Han, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Jin, R.; et al. Mechanical activation opens a lipid-lined pore in OSCA ion channels. Nature 2024, 628, 910-8.
72. Maity, K.; Heumann, J. M.; McGrath, A. P.; et al. Cryo-EM structure of OSCA1.2 from Oryza sativa elucidates the mechanical basis of potential membrane hyperosmolality gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116, 14309-18.
73. Jojoa-Cruz, S.; Saotome, K.; Murthy, S. E.; et al. Cryo-EM structure of the mechanically activated ion channel OSCA1.2. Elife 2018, 7, e41845.
74. Shan, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chen, M.; et al. Activation mechanisms of dimeric mechanosensitive OSCA/TMEM63 channels. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7504.
75. Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, L. Structure of the hyperosmolality-gated calcium-permeable channel OSCA1.2. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5060.
76. Zhang, M.; Wang, D.; Kang, Y.; et al. Structure of the mechanosensitive OSCA channels. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 850-8.
77. Paulino, C.; Kalienkova, V.; Lam, A. K. M.; Neldner, Y.; Dutzler, R. Activation mechanism of the calcium-activated chloride channel TMEM16A revealed by cryo-EM. Nature 2017, 552, 421-5.
78. Bavi, N.; Cox, C. D.; Nikolaev, Y. A.; Martinac, B. Molecular insights into the force-from-lipids gating of mechanosensitive channels. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2023, 36, 100706.
79. Lin, S. Y.; Corey, D. P. TRP channels in mechanosensation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15, 350-7.
80. Berrier, C.; Pozza, A.; de Lacroix de Lavalette, A.; et al. The purified mechanosensitive channel TREK-1 is directly sensitive to membrane tension. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 27307-14.
81. Engbers, S.; van Langevelde, P. H.; Hetterscheid, D. G. H.; Klein, J. E. M. N. Discussing the terms biomimetic and bioinspired within bioinorganic chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 20057-67.
82. Pérez-Mitta, G.; Albesa, A. G.; Trautmann, C.; Toimil-Molares, M. E.; Azzaroni, O. Bioinspired integrated nanosystems based on solid-state nanopores: “iontronic” transduction of biological, chemical and physical stimuli. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 890-913.
83. Xin, W.; Jiang, L.; Wen, L. Engineering bio-inspired self-assembled nanochannels for smart ion transport. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202207369.
84. van der Heyden, F. H.; Bonthuis, D. J.; Stein, D.; Meyer, C.; Dekker, C. Power generation by pressure-driven transport of ions in nanofluidic channels. Nano. Lett. 2007, 7, 1022-5.
85. Jubin, L.; Poggioli, A.; Siria, A.; Bocquet, L. Dramatic pressure-sensitive ion conduction in conical nanopores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115, 4063-8.
86. Wang, X.; Guo, C.; Su, Z.; et al. Flexible iontronic pressure sensing technology: advanced structural ionic layer. Iontronics 2026, 2, 1.
87. Liu, J.; Kvetny, M.; Feng, J.; et al. Surface charge density determination of single conical nanopores based on normalized ion current rectification. Langmuir 2012, 28, 1588-95.
88. Yang, J.; Su, H.; Lian, C.; Shang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, J. Understanding surface charge regulation in silica nanopores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 15373-80.
89. Mouterde, T.; Keerthi, A.; Poggioli, A. R.; et al. Molecular streaming and its voltage control in ångström-scale channels. Nature 2019, 567, 87-90.
90. Radha, B.; Esfandiar, A.; Wang, F. C.; et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 2016, 538, 222-5.
91. Esfandiar, A.; Radha, B.; Wang, F. C.; et al. Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits. Science 2017, 358, 511-3.
92. Amiri, H.; Shepard, K. L.; Nuckolls, C.; Hernández Sánchez, R. Single-walled carbon nanotubes: mimics of biological ion channels. Nano. Lett. 2017, 17, 1204-11.
93. Noh, Y.; Aluru, N. R. Ion transport in two-dimensional flexible nanoporous membranes. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 11090-8.
94. Chou, Y. C.; Masih Das, P.; Monos, D. S.; Drndić, M. Lifetime and stability of silicon nitride nanopores and nanopore arrays for ionic measurements. ACS. Nano. 2020, 14, 6715-28.
95. Wang, Y.; Ying, C.; Zhou, W.; de Vreede, L.; Liu, Z.; Tian, J. Fabrication of multiple nanopores in a SiNx membrane via controlled breakdown. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1234.
96. Xu, Y.; Yazbeck, R.; Duan, C. Anomalous mechanosensitive ion transport in nanoparticle-blocked nanopores. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 224702.
97. Ma, S.; Hou, Y.; Hao, J.; Lin, C.; Zhao, J.; Sui, X. Well-defined nanostructures by block copolymers and mass transport applications in energy conversion. Polymers. (Basel). 2022, 14, 4568.
98. Xiang, L.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Yang, Q.; Xu, F.; Mai, Y. Block copolymer self-assembly directed synthesis of porous materials with ordered bicontinuous structures and their potential applications. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2207684.
99. Li, C.; Zhai, Y.; Jiang, H.; et al. Bioinspired light-driven chloride pump with helical porphyrin channels. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 832.
100. Zhang, Z.; Sui, X.; Li, P.; et al. Ultrathin and ion-selective Janus membranes for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8905-14.
101. Chen, W.; Xiang, Y.; Kong, X.; Wen, L. Polymer-based membranes for promoting osmotic energy conversion. Giant 2022, 10, 100094.
102. Li, C.; Jiang, H.; Liu, P.; et al. One porphyrin per chain self-assembled helical ion-exchange channels for ultrahigh osmotic energy conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 9472-8.
103. Wang, J.; Hou, J.; Zhang, H.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, L. Single nanochannel-aptamer-based biosensor for ultrasensitive and selective cocaine detection. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 2033-9.
104. Zhang, Z.; Rahman, M. M.; Ternes, I.; Bajer, B.; Abetz, V. Engineering soft nanochannels in isoporous block copolymer nanofiltration membranes for ion separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2024, 691, 122270.
105. Zheng, S. P.; Huang, L. B.; Sun, Z.; Barboiu, M. Self-assembled artificial ion-channels toward natural selection of functions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 566-97.
106. Muraoka, T.; Umetsu, K.; Tabata, K. V.; et al. Mechano-sensitive synthetic ion channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18016-23.
107. Dong, J.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Sun, M.; Hou, J. Artificial transmembrane channels displaying mechanosensitivity. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2026, 37, 111420.
108. Li, C.; Chen, C.; Shi, J.; Han, W.; Fu, Q.; Yang, L. Biomimetic action-potential transmission via mechano-gated potassium channels assembled by quadruple hydrogen-bonded crown ethers. Sci. Adv. 2026, 12, eaea6329.
109. Malla, J. A.; Umesh, R. M.; Vijay, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Lahiri, M.; Talukdar, P. Apoptosis-inducing activity of a fluorescent barrel-rosette M+/Cl- channel. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 2420-8.
110. Ren, C.; Ding, X.; Roy, A.; et al. A halogen bond-mediated highly active artificial chloride channel with high anticancer activity. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 4044-51.
111. Park, S. H.; Hwang, I.; McNaughton, D. A.; et al. Synthetic Na+/K+ exchangers promote apoptosis by disturbing cellular cation homeostasis. Chem 2021, 7, 3325-39.
112. Sun, S.; Xu, Z.; Lin, Z.; et al. A biomimetic ion channel shortens the QT interval of type 2 long QT syndrome through efficient transmembrane transport of potassium ions. Acta. Biomater. 2024, 181, 391-401.
113. Xiao, K.; Sun, Z.; Jin, X.; et al. ERG3 potassium channel-mediated suppression of neuronal intrinsic excitability and prevention of seizure generation in mice. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 4729-52.
114. Guichard, M.; Thomine, S.; Frachisse, J. M. Mechanotransduction in the spotlight of mechano-sensitive channels. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2022, 68, 102252.
115. Amoli, V.; Kim, J. S.; Jee, E.; et al. A bioinspired hydrogen bond-triggered ultrasensitive ionic mechanoreceptor skin. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4019.
116. Dobashi, Y.; Yao, D.; Petel, Y.; et al. Piezoionic mechanoreceptors: Force-induced current generation in hydrogels. Science 2022, 376, 502-7.
117. Zheng, Q.; Zhang, D.; Bu, T.; et al. A bioinspired deep-sea iontronic skin for underwater robotic tactile sensing. npj. Flex. Electron. 2025, 10, 8.
118. Xiong, T.; Li, W.; Yu, P.; Mao, L. Fluidic memristor: bringing chemistry to neuromorphic devices. Innovation. (Camb). 2023, 4, 100435.
119. Xie, B.; Xiong, T.; Li, W.; et al. Perspective on nanofluidic memristors: from mechanism to application. Chem. Asian. J. 2022, 17, e202200682.
120. Khan, M. U.; Hassan, B.; Alazzam, A.; Eissa, S.; Mohammad, B. Brain inspired iontronic fluidic memristive and memcapacitive device for self-powered electronics. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2025, 11, 37.
121. Emmerich, T.; Teng, Y.; Ronceray, N.; et al. Nanofluidic logic with mechano-ionic memristive switches. Nat. Electron. 2024, 7, 271-8.
123. Yu, L.; Li, X.; Luo, C.; et al. Bioinspired nanofluidic iontronics for brain-like computing. Nano. Res. 2023, 17, 503-14.
124. Wei, X.; Wu, Z.; Gao, H.; et al. Mechano-gated iontronic piezomemristor for temporal-tactile neuromorphic plasticity. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1060.
125. He, Y.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Mechano-gated nanofluidic piezomemristor: elastic nanochannel bridging dynamic pressure modulation and neuromorphic plasticity. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 50292-301.
126. Doerner, J. F.; Febvay, S.; Clapham, D. E. Controlled delivery of bioactive molecules into live cells using the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 990.
127. Moroni, M.; Servin-Vences, M. R.; Fleischer, R.; Sánchez-Carranza, O.; Lewin, G. R. Voltage gating of mechanosensitive PIEZO channels. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1096.
