Download PDF
Review  |  Open Access  |  2 Jun 2026

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Views: 72 |  Downloads: 2 |  Cited:  0
Microstructures 2026, 6, 2026076.
10.20517/microstructures.2025.168 |  © The Author(s) 2026.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Abstract

Thermoelectric materials are critical for high-efficiency energy utilization and carbon neutrality. With the booming development of wearable electronics, flexible sensor networks and smart textiles, flexible thermoelectric generators (f-TEGs) have garnered immense interest for self-powered health monitoring and personalized thermal management. Focusing on wearable feasibility, this review summarizes the fundamental thermoelectric physics and performance metrics. It also highlights recent advances in flexible materials - including inorganic (carbon nanomaterials, chalcogenides), organic [polyaniline, polypyrrole, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), and composites], and inorganic-organic hybrid systems - with an emphasis on structure-property relationships and wearable-adapted processing. At the device level, the review compares fiber/yarn, film/ribbon, and porous/textile-like architectures. It focuses on heat transfer, mechanical durability, and skin comfort, which are critical for on-skin applications. Key wearable-specific bottlenecks are outlined, such as stable n-type materials, scalable fabrication, and environmental/biological durability. Finally, it proposes opportunities for application-oriented f-TEG platforms, facilitating the development of next-generation wearable energy-harvesting systems through interdisciplinary collaboration.

Keywords

Thermoelectric materials, flexible thermoelectric generators, energy harvesting, nanostructured materials, wearable electronics

INTRODUCTION

Thermoelectric materials can directly and reversibly convert heat into electricity across a temperature gradient and have emerged as a key class of functional materials for high-efficiency energy utilization and carbon neutrality[1,2]. Compared with conventional electromechanical power generation or refrigeration technologies, thermoelectric conversion does not require mechanical moving parts and offers clear advantages such as compact structure, rapid response, low noise, high reliability and easy miniaturization and integration. These merits have sparked broad interest in thermoelectric materials for sustainable energy harvesting and solid-state cooling, and have increasingly aligned the field with the development of flexible and wearable technologies including self-powered sensing, smart textiles, and human-centric thermal management[3-5]. Benefiting from continuous progress in materials design and nanoscale structural engineering, the dimensionless figure of merit thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT) of classical bulk inorganic thermoelectric materials such as Bi2Te3, PbTe and SnSe has been significantly improved in both room-temperature and mid-temperature ranges, providing a solid foundation for high-efficiency thermoelectric energy conversion[3,6,7]. However, these traditional bulk inorganic materials are generally characterized by high modulus, pronounced brittleness and relatively large density, making them difficult to withstand routine bending, twisting or tensile deformation[8,9]. As a result, they exhibit clear limitations in structural adaptability and service compatibility for flexible electronics and wearable applications.

In parallel, the rapid development of wearable electronics, flexible sensing networks, smart textiles and continuous health-monitoring systems has imposed more stringent requirements on safe, stable, and sustainable microscale power sources[10,11]. Low-grade heat flows on human skin, in ambient air streams, and around operating electronic devices are typically broad in spatial distribution and long in time scale, and modest in energy density. Conventional battery-powered supplies not only raise maintenance costs and environmental burden, but also limit truly unobtrusive wear and long-term autonomous operation of devices. Against this backdrop, flexible thermoelectric generators (f-TEGs) harvest low-grade heat and convert it into electricity by establishing a temperature difference between the human body, environment, and the device. These devices offer a promising self-powered solution for wearable systems, eliminating the need for frequent battery replacement, and serve as a key energy interface between human thermal resources and the flexible electronics ecosystem[12,13]. Compared with photovoltaics[14,15], piezoelectrics[16,17], triboelectrics[18,19], and other energy-harvesting approaches, flexible thermoelectric technologies do not depend on light or vigorous motion. They can operate stably around the clock - both indoors and outdoors - and under static or mildly dynamic conditions.

Numerous of reviews on thermoelectric materials and f-TEGs have been published, but most focus on either material-level fundamental properties (e.g., ZT optimization) or general device design, with little attention to wearable-specific demands and practical applicability. Existing reviews typically classify systems by material type (inorganic/organic/composite) or device dimensionality [one-dimensional (1D)/two-dimensional (2D)/three-dimensional (3D)]. This classification separates components from application scenarios and fails to meet the core needs of wearable electronics. In contrast, this review distinguishes itself by centering on “wearable feasibility” as its core logic, and constructs a human-centric framework that links material design, device architecture, and application around wearable-specific challenges. Against this backdrop, a systematic overview of flexible thermoelectric materials and flexible wearable thermoelectric generators is crucial for clarifying the intrinsic correlations among structure, performance and application, identifying key bottlenecks and guiding future research directions. In this review, we first provide a brief recap of the physical mechanisms of the thermoelectric effect and the core performance metrics, thereby laying the theoretical basis for the design of flexible thermoelectric materials and devices. We then focus on three aspects: (i) materials-design strategies and performance-modulation rules for inorganic flexible thermoelectric systems, conducting polymers and their composites; (ii) structural characteristics, fabrication techniques, and representative application scenarios of different flexible device architectures - including 1D fibers and yarns, 2D films and ribbons, and 3D microstructured devices; (iii) the latest advances and trends of flexible wearable thermoelectric systems in human-body heat harvesting, self-powered health monitoring and multifunctional, multi-field-coupled applications. Finally, we discuss the remaining challenges associated with large-area manufacturing, long-term stability, biocompatibility and system integration. We also offer an outlook on future research priorities and application prospects of flexible thermoelectric materials and wearable thermoelectric generators, aiming to provide guidance for the development of next-generation high-performance, engineering-ready flexible thermoelectric energy solutions.

FLEXIBLE THERMOELECTRIC MATERIALS

Flexible thermoelectric materials are the material core of f-TEGs for wearable energy harvesting, whose thermoelectric performance directly determines the energy conversion efficiency of devices, and whose mechanical properties affect their wearable adaptability. Table 1 summarizes the key thermoelectric properties [e.g., ZT, the Seebeck coefficient (S), electrical conductivity (σ), and total thermal conductivity (κ)] of mainstream organic, inorganic, and organic-inorganic composite flexible thermoelectric materials. It intuitively reflects their performance differences and providing a basis for the subsequent detailed analysis of each material system.

Table 1

Key thermoelectric properties of different flexible thermoelectric material systems

Materials Material classification n/p type ZT S (μV K-1) σ (S cm-1) κ (W m-1 K-1) Ref.
PEDOT:PSS films Organic p 0.3 21.9 2,980 0.22 [20]
PEDOT:PSS ink Organic p - 16-17 5.847 - [21]
PEDOT:PSS-rGO Organic p - 60 - - [22]
CNT/P3HT Organic p - 41.8 1,170 - [23]
Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 Inorganic p 0.04 150 - 1.1 [24]
Bi2Te3 film Inorganic n - -37 - - [25]
Na-doped PbTe Inorganic p 1.4 295.3 102-103 0.8 [26]
Sb-doped PbTe Inorganic n 1.2 -227.6 102-103 0.65 [26]
Te/PEDOT film Organic- inorganic P - 42 - - [27]
Cu2S/PEDOT:PSS Organic- inorganic P - 33 192.17 - [28]
PVP/Ag2Se Organic- inorganic n 1.1 -143 929 0.508 [29]
CNT yarn + PEI Organic- inorganic n - -68.7 1,408.3 35 [30]

Inorganic thermoelectric materials

Owing to their excellent thermoelectric performance, inorganic thermoelectric materials have long held an important position in the field of efficient thermoelectric conversion. Especially in flexible thermoelectric device applications, inorganic materials, inorganic materials exhibit stronger competitiveness than organic materials due to their outstanding Seebeck coefficients and electrical conductivities[13,31,32]. However, traditional inorganic materials are often highly rigid, limiting their application in wearable electronics and flexible devices. Therefore, enabling inorganic materials to be flexible and bendable through structural optimization, nanostructuring, and interface engineering has become a research focus.

Current research on flexible inorganic thermoelectric materials mainly concentrates on two major systems: carbon nanomaterials and chalcogenides. These two material types have distinct advantages and challenges. Various innovative strategies have been adopted to optimize their thermoelectric performance and enhance their flexibility. The following section details the research progress of these two inorganic thermoelectric materials types and their application potential in flexible thermoelectric devices.

Carbon-nanomaterial thermoelectric

Carbon nanomaterials, including graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and fullerenes [Figure 1][33,34], have emerged as promising candidates for flexible thermoelectric materials due to their excellent electrical conductivity, mechanical properties, and thermal stability. In particular, graphene, as a two-dimensional material, has made remarkable progress in flexible thermoelectric device research in recent years due to its ultrahigh electrical conductivity and outstanding thermoelectric performance. CNTs, especially single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), also play an important role in flexible thermoelectric material development due to their tunable conductivity and high flexibility. Fullerenes are carbon allotropes with cage-like structures. They are widely used in thermoelectric, electronics, and materials science for their unique properties.

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of zero-, one-, two- and three-dimensional carbon nanomaterials.

Structural regulation strategies, such as doping, nanostructuring, and composite design, have significantly improved the thermoelectric performance of carbon nanomaterials. For example, graphene/CNT composites exhibit excellent power factors. These composites combine the high electrical conductivity of graphene with the excellent thermoelectric response of CNTs, fully leveraging the synergistic effect of the materials.

CNTs are tubular materials formed by carbon atoms linked via covalent bonds with sp2 hybridization into hexagonal units. Carbon atoms form a conjugated electron cloud via a pair of unhybridized p electrons extending across the CNTs. Based on the number of layers in their tubular structure, CNTs can be divided into SWCNTs and MWCNTs[35,36]. The application of CNTs in flexible thermoelectric devices has been extensively studied. In particular, for preparing thermoelectric aerogels, their excellent electrical conductivity and tunability make them ideal candidates.

Thermoelectric aerogels constructed from CNTs exhibit high conductivity and, owing to their thickness advantage, can directly capture heat energy along the temperature-gradient direction, making them ideal flexible thermoelectric materials. CNT aerogels can be constructed via a simple, rapid-evaporation process. For example, Lee et al. constructed three-dimensional MWCNT aerogels using a rapid solvent-evaporation method. The fabrication flowchart and various aerogel morphologies are shown in Figure 2A and B[37]. Controlling the concentration of MWCNTs in the slurry enables the preparation of aerogels with different densities and pore diameters.

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 2. (A) Preparation process of the CNTs aerogel; (B) images of CNTs aerogel fabricated using template method. (A and B) Reproduced with permission[37]. Copyright 2019, WILEY‐VCH; (C) Synthesis and modification of MWCNTs by CVD, (D) photographs of large-size MWCNTs film, (E) TEM image of MWCNTs, (F) Raman spectroscopy of MWCNTs. (C-F) Reproduced with permission[39]. Copyright 2022, WILEY‐VCH; (G and H) Morphology, (I) Raman spectra and (J) TEM image of graphene-based aerogels, (K) stress-stain curve and (L) TE responses of graphene aerogel. (G-L) Reproduced with permission[47]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society; (M) Optical photographs, (N) preparation process and (O) Raman spectra film. (M-O) Reproduced with permission[48]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier Ltd. CNTs: Carbon nanotubes; MWCNTs: multi-walled carbon nanotubes; CVD: chemical vapor deposition; TEM: transmission electron microscope; TE: thermoelectric; SWCNT: single-walled carbon nanotube; TCNQ: tetracyanoquinodimethane; PEI: polyethyleneimine.

Although the porous structure of aerogels can effectively reduce thermal conductivity, it also results in relatively low electrical conductivity. In contrast, CNT films exhibit significantly higher electrical conductivity. In addition to high electrical conductivity, CNT films have a key advantage - large-scale production can be achieved via chemical vapor deposition (CVD), which lays an important foundation for the commercial application of thermoelectric materials. For example, Shi et al. fabricated Ag2Se/MWCNTs composite films via screen printing. In these films, Ag2Se nanoparticles bridge MWCNT networks, achieving a room-temperature power factor of 168 μW m-1 K-2 and a thermal conductivity of 0.28 W m-1 K-1. The composite retains 88% of its initial conductivity after 800 bending cycles (R = 5 mm), making it suitable for photothermoelectric integration in wearable devices[38]. Sun et al. used thiophene as the carbon source, ferrocene as the catalyst, and nitrogen gas as the protective atmosphere, respectively, and synthesized MWCNTs in batches via a high-temperature floating CVD method [Figure 2C]. Large-area oriented CNT films were collected using a rotating roller [Figure 2D]. In Figure 2E, the average inner diameter of the MWCNTs is approximately 2 nm, and the outer diameter is approximately 5 nm. Raman spectroscopy confirms the structural characteristics of MWCNTs, and a low IG/ID ratio verifies their low carbon defect advantage [Figure 2F][39].

In 2004, physicists Geim and Novoselov from the University of Manchester, UK obtained single-layer graphene from graphite via mechanical exfoliation[40,41], marking the birth of the first two-dimensional material and igniting a global research boom on two-dimensional materials. Graphene is a two-dimensional nanosheet formed by carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal honeycomb structure via sp2-hybridized orbitals. The thickness of single-layer graphene is approximately 0.335 nm, approaching the thickness of a single carbon atom[42,43]. In the six-membered carbon ring of graphene, each carbon atom is bonded to three neighboring carbon atoms via σ bonds. The π electrons not participating in σ bonding interact with those of other carbon atoms to form a large delocalized π bond, endowing graphene with excellent electrical properties by enabling electrons to move freely within its crystal structure. Owing to its long-range π-π conjugated structure, graphene exhibits numerous outstanding properties, including high chemical stability, high mechanical performance, and tunable thermal conductivity[44,45]. Building on improved graphene preparation, tailoring, and modification methods, large-area, high-quality graphene with precisely controlled patterns and specific functional groups can be used to fabricate devices. These advances will promote in-depth research on graphene’s novel structures and electronic devices - such as magic-angle graphene and graphene-based single-molecule junctions - to facilitate the exploration of graphene’s novel properties and applications[46].

Current forming processes can be used to prepare graphene into a series of macroscopic bulk materials. Based on structural and morphological differences, these macroscopic materials are mainly divided into three categories: 3D aerogels, 2D films, and 1D fibers. Graphene aerogels used in the thermoelectric field are mainly constructed via template methods, including polymer-template and ice-template methods. For example, Zhang et al. used polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as the skeleton and mixed bulk NaCl into a graphene/PDMS mixed solution to serve as a template. The characterization and properties of the thermoelectric (TE) sponges are shown in Figure 2G-L[47]. Owing to the extremely high fracture strength of PDMS, the graphene-based aerogel was endowed with excellent mechanical properties. It could still effectively maintain good morphological integrity and resistance stability during repeated compression cycles.

Unlike the CVD method for preparing large-area CNT films, the mass preparation of graphene films mainly relies on slurry-forming methods. For example, Feng et al. used a graphene dispersion with a concentration of 25 mg mL-1 as the slurry, cast it on a conveyor belt moving at constant speed, controlled the thickness of the gel-state slurry with a roller, and obtained large-size layered graphene films after heating, drying, and peeling [Figure 2M-O][48]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirm that graphene films prepared via the doctor-blading process exhibit good uniformity. Based on graphene’s conduction mechanism, the Wiedemann-Franz law, and Mott’s law, further optimization of carrier concentration can enable graphene’s room-temperature power factor to exceed 200 μW cm-1 K-2. To reduce thermal conductivity, Guo et al. prepared layered graphene oxide (GO) films with porous structures via the ice-template method and thermally reduced them in high-temperature N2 and NH3 atmospheres; N doping via NH3 resulted in n-type conductive graphene materials. The continuous porous structure in graphene films can reduce the lattice thermal conductivity via phonon-scattering mechanisms[49]. In addition, the porous structure increases the contact barrier between graphene nanosheets and enhances the energy-filtering effect, slightly increasing the Seebeck coefficient of graphene films. Furthermore, they assembled graphene films onto pre-stretched PDMS substrates. After release, graphene formed wrinkled structures on the PDMS film, thereby gaining stretchability. This pre-stretching process offers a new approach for the fabrication and structural design of flexible thermoelectric films.

Chalcogenide nano thermoelectric materials

Chalcogenide nanomaterials (e.g., Bi2Te3, PbTe) have long dominated the fields of thermoelectric power generation and refrigeration due to their excellent thermoelectric performance. In particular, Bi2Te3, as one of the most mature thermoelectric materials, exhibits optimal thermoelectric performance at room temperature and is widely used in thermoelectric power generation and refrigeration devices. However, traditional Bi2Te3 and other chalcogenide materials are limited for use in flexible and wearable thermoelectric devices due to their high rigidity and brittleness. Therefore, researchers have improved both the thermoelectric performance and flexibility of these chalcogenide materials via nanostructuring, alloying, doping, and interface engineering, making them more suitable for flexible thermoelectric devices[50].

VA2-VIA3 nanomaterials possess typical layered structures, with five atoms per layer arranged along the z-axis in the order VIA-VA-VIA-VA-VIA; adjacent layers are bonded via weak van der Waals forces[51-55]. The layered structure endows VA2-VIA3 materials with the ability to grow into atomic-layer-thick two-dimensional nanosheets, enabling directional regulation of their electrical, thermal, acoustic, and other physical and chemical properties. Current research on VA2-VIA3 thermoelectric materials mainly focuses on Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, and Bi2Te3, as well as their modified derivatives; the room-temperature ZT values of bulk VA2-VIA3 materials have exceeded 1. Compared with bulk materials, nanostructured Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, and Bi2Te3 can be assembled into flexible film materials via screen printing, inkjet printing, and slurry doctor-blading and other processes[51,52]. Thus, they are widely used in the flexible thermoelectric field.

As shown in Figure 3A, Shi et al. from the Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry synthesized Sb2Te3 nanosheets with regular hexagonal structures via a solvothermal method; their edge length and thickness are approximately 800 and 78.5 nm, respectively. The schematic phase characterization of Sb2Te3 nanosheets is shown in Figure 3B-D[54]. Figure 3E-G show the temperature-dependent in-plane thermoelectric (TE) properties - including electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and power factor of flexible Sb2Te3 film printed on Kapton after sintering at 400 °C[52]. In the anisotropic layered structure of Sb2Te3, Sb and Te elements are arranged along the c-axis in the order -Te1-Sb-Te2-Sb-Te1-; van der Waals forces exist between adjacent Te1 layers, while covalent bonds connect Te and Sb atoms. Thus, Sb2Te3 nanosheets can be described as numerous crystalline planes extending vertically and connected by van der Waals bonds. From a thermodynamic perspective, the free energy required to break covalent bonds is higher than that required to break interlayer van der Waals forces. Thus, the growth rate of Sb2Te3 crystals along the upper and lower crystal planes is faster than that along the c-axis, ultimately forming a two-dimensional planar structure.

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 3. (A-D) Schematic structure and phase characterization of Sb2Te3 nanosheets. (A-D) Reproduced with permission[54]. Copyright 2008, WILEY‐VCH; (E-G) 3D printing method to construct TE materials based on Sb2Te3 nanosheets and Temperature-dependent in-plane TE properties; (E-G) Reproduced with permission[52]. Copyright 2019, WILEY‐VCH; (H) Growth mechanism of Te nanorods and Ag2Te nanorods; (H) Reproduced with permission[58]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l; (I) Schematic diagram of Ag2Se thin film prepared by vacuum thermal evaporation method and (J) power factor comparison data; (I and J) Reproduced with permission[56]. Copyright 2022, Royal Society of Chemistry; (K) Fabrication of the flexible TE device. (K) Reproduced with permission[62]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. TE: Thermoelectric.

IB2-VIA thermoelectric materials mainly include Ag2Te, Cu2Te, Ag2Se, and Cu2Se, as well as their modified derivatives; their main preparation methods are template methods and vacuum thermal evaporation[56-58]. IB2-VIA thermoelectric materials can optimize their thermoelectric performance by controlling the Ag/Cu elements ratio to regulate carrier concentration; they can also achieve p-type and n-type conduction characteristics by changing the majority carrier type.

In the template method, nanowires or nanorods are first synthesized via a solvothermal process, followed by the growth of Ag and Cu metal elements within the nanowires. Thus, IB2-VIA thermoelectric materials prepared via the template method generally exhibit one-dimensional wire-like morphologies. For example, Park et al. from Chung-Ang University, South Korea, synthesized Te nanorods via a solvothermal method and then modified them in an Ag precursor solution[58], preparing Ag2Te nanomaterials with morphologies similar to those of the Te nanorods; the growth mechanisms of Te nanowires and Ag2Te nanorods are shown in Figure 3H. Ag2Te is an n-type narrow-band-gap semiconductor material with a room-temperature electrical conductivity of up to 200 S cm-1. The wire-like structure not only optimizes thermoelectric performance but also lays a foundation for constructing flexible materials.

Unlike the template method, the vacuum thermal evaporation process can deposit bulk targets into nanomaterials and form various shapes via masks, making it suitable for application in the flexible thermoelectric field. As shown in Figure 3I and J, Zheng et al. used both Ag and Se ingots as targets; during vacuum thermal evaporation, excited Ag and Se atoms were deposited on a polyimide substrate and assembled into Ag2Se films, respectively[56]. Adjusting the evaporation rates of Ag and Se atoms during vacuum evaporation enables the preparation of Ag2Se materials with different atomic ratios. At 348 K, the optimized power factor can reach 19.6 μW cm-1 K-2, which is close to the highest reported thermoelectric performance of Ag2Se-based materials to date.

In addition to Ag- and Cu-based IB2-VIA group compounds, p-type Mg3Sb2-based Zintl compounds are promising candidates for flexible thermoelectric materials, and their performance optimization strategies provides important references for the thermoelectric improvement of this group of materials. Hu et al.[57] achieved a significant breakthrough in the thermoelectric performance of p-type Mg3Sb2-based materials via the synergistic regulation of electronic orbital alignment and hierarchical phonon scattering. Its core design involves two aspects: first, alloying at the Sb site by introducing Bi elements to regulate the overlap degree of electronic orbitals at the top of the valence band, increasing the effective carrier mass to 1.8 m0 while maintaining high carrier mobility (~80 cm2 V-1 s-1), which significantly enhances the Seebeck coefficient (185 μV K-1 at room temperature); second, constructing a three-level hierarchical structure of “point defects - grain boundaries - nano-domains”, reducing the lattice thermal conductivity to 0.42 W m-1 K-1 (300 K) via Sb/Bi atomic mass differences, grain refinement (particle size ~200 nm), and nano-domain boundary scattering. Benefiting from the above dual regulation, the thermoelectric figure of merit ZT of this p-type Mg3Sb2-Bi system reaches 1.5 at 573 K and 0.85 at room temperature, with an electrical conductivity of up to 320 S cm-1 and a peak power factor of 108 μW cm-1 K-2.

This strategy breaks the bottleneck of “incompatibility between high electrical conductivity and low thermal conductivity” in traditional IB2-VIA group materials, demonstrating that the performance leap of p-type thermoelectric materials can be achieved via electronic structure regulation and multi-scale phonon scattering design. This provides new ideas for the p-type optimization and flexible device application of IB2-VIA group nanomaterials[57].

VIB-VIA2 thermoelectric materials mainly include MoS2, WS2, MoSe2, and WSe2[59-63]. First-principles (Density Functional Theory, DFT) calculations have demonstrated that monolayer transition-metal chalcogenides (TMDCs) exhibit excellent room-temperature thermoelectric performance, though their performance is still lower than that of traditional materials such as Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3. Constructing heterostructures to enhance the thermoelectric performance of VIB-VIA2 materials is a widely used strategy currently[59].

Liquid-phase exfoliation is a commonly used method for preparing VI-VI2 nanomaterials. For example, Guo et al. used Li-ion intercalation in bulk MoS2 in cyclohexane solvent to break the weak van der Waals forces between MoS2 layers and exfoliated single-layer or few-layer MoS2 via ultrasonication [Figure 3K][62]. However, MoS2 prepared via ion-intercalation methods contains both the 1T metallic phase and 2H semiconducting phase; the poor conductivity of 2H-phase MoS2 is unfavorable for optimizing the thermoelectric performance of MoS2 materials. To further enhance thermoelectric performance, they modified the surface of MoS2 nanosheets with an Au precursor solution to form Schottky contacts on the nanosheet surfaces, which act as carrier-transport channels and low-energy carrier-filtering barriers. By regulating the Au content, the electrical conductivity of Au- MoS2 films increased from 88.7 S cm-1 to 177.1 S cm-1, and the energy-filtering effect promoted an increase in the Seebeck coefficient from 84.6 μV K-1 to 96.9 μV K-1; the optimal power factor was about 166.3 μW cm-1 K-2. To further enhance thermoelectric performance, they compounded exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets with CNTs and constructed porous structures via freeze-drying to reduce the thermal conductivity of the composite film; the thermal conductivity was as low as 19.3 m W m-1 K-1. CNTs acted as conductive pathways to ensure carrier transport, so the corresponding ZT reached 0.17[64].

Organic thermoelectric materials

Types of conductive polymers

Conductive polymers generally contain conjugated π-bond structures with alternating single and double bonds. After chemical doping, π electrons can delocalize along the polymer backbone, resulting each carbon atom to have an unpaired π electron, thereby triggering charge transport and exhibiting conductive or semiconducting properties[65,66]. Based on the conduction mechanism, conductive polymers can be divided into composite-type and structural-type. Composite-type conductive polymers consist of a poorly conductive polymer matrix, highly conductive fillers, and additives; their conductive function mainly depends on inorganic fillers. Common highly conductive fillers include conductive carbon materials and metal powders, for example. Structural-type conductive polymers are mostly conjugated polymers with highly delocalized electrons, which themselves can provide carriers and thus possess basic conductivity; after chemical or electrochemical doping, their electrical conductivity can be significantly improved and, even comparable to that of metals in some cases. Chemical doping or the introducing different valence states can alter the distribution of holes and electrons in conductive polymers, enabling precise regulation of their charge-transport properties. Chemical doping includes p-type and n-type doping, which essentially correspond to the oxidation or reduction processes of the conjugated polymer backbone: p-type doping corresponds to the oxidation of the conjugated chain, and n-type doping corresponds to the reduction of the conjugated chain. Among p-type conductive polymers, polyaniline (PANI), polypyrrole (PPy), and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) have the most application prospects. They exhibit high electrical conductivity, good stability, and simple synthesis, making them representative among conductive polymers.

Polyaniline

The thermoelectric performance of PANI mainly depends on its synthesis method and doping conditions. Currently, the structural formula of PANI generally adopts the benzoid-quinoid structural model, where the value of y reflects the redox state. When y = 0.5, the ratio of benzoid to quinoid structures in the molecular chain is 3:1 (a half-oxidized, half-reduced structure), referred to as emeraldine base PANI. In this state, PANI molecules can undergo a sudden transition from an insulating state to a conductive state via doping. When a protonic acid reacts with emeraldine base PANI, the amino groups are first protonated, and the positive charges carried by the protons transfer along the polymer backbone and become periodically distributed, altering the charge state of the molecular orbitals. The conduction mechanism of PANI mainly involves three models: the granular metal-island model, the electronic-conduction model, and the polaron-bipolaron model. The granular metal-island model posits that non-uniform doping creates metallic and non-metallic regions in the PANI chains, with metallic islands dispersed in an insulating matrix. The electron-hopping theory assumes that electrons in the PANI chains hop from reduced units to oxidized units to complete conduction. The polaron-bipolar on conversion model suggests that benzenoid bipolar facilitate charge transport along the molecular chains.

The electrical conductivity of PANI is significantly affected by the type of dopant acid. For example, Li et al. discussed the influence of HCl doping concentration on the thermoelectric performance of PANI within the temperature range of 303-423 K. Figure 4A and B show the synthesis mechanism of PANI and the Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) image of HCl (1.0 M)-doped PANI powder. The results in Figure 4C show that with increasing HCl doping concentration, the electrical conductivity of PANI first increases and then decreases[67]. Yao et al. synthesized fibrous PANI powder using camphor sulfonic acid (CSA) as the dopant and m-cresol as the solvent. Compared with amorphous PANI, PANI with such micro-nano structures have a more ordered chain arrangement; the templating effect of CSA promotes the growth of PANI toward a more crystalline orientation during synthesis, consequently enhancing both the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of PANI/CSA, with the power factor approximately 20 times that of PANI synthesized without CSA doping. Subsequently, the same research group successfully prepared PANI films with different packing states by simply adjusting the m-cresol solvent content, using CSA as the dopant acid[68,69].

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 4. (A) Synthesis mechanism of PANI, (B) FESEM image of HCl (1.0 M) doped PANI powder and (C) The temperature dependence of the Seebeck coefficient of various HCl-doped PANI. (A-C) Reproduced with permission[67]. Copyright 2010, Elsevier; (D) Schematic of the layer‐by‐layer deposition process; (E) The structure of thermoelectric film components used; (F) Images of aqueous PANI solution, and graphene and DWCNT stabilized by PEDOT:PSS, in water; (D-F) Reproduced with permission[70]. Copyright 2016, WILEY‐VCH; (G) Schematic illustration showing the preparation process for the PPy nanostructures by chemical oxidation polymerization; (H) Thermoelectric performance of electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient and power factor for PPy prepared with different oxidants; (I) Thermoelectric performance of electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient and power factor for PPy nanowires prepared at different APS concentrations; (J) Thermoelectric performance of electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient and power factor for the PPy samples prepared in various reaction media; (G-J) Reproduced with permission[71]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry; (K) Schematic presentation of the PEDOT benzoid structure, the ordered quinoid structure in bulk and nanostructured PEDOT samples and Thermoelectric performance of bulk PEDOT and PEDOT nanostructures; FESEM images of (L) bulk PEDOT power and PEDOT nanostructures of (M) globular nanoparticles, (N) nanorods or ellipsoidal nanoparticles, (O) nanotubes and (P) nanofibers; (K-P) Reproduced with permission[77]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry. PANI: Polyaniline; PEDOT: poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene); PSS: polystyrene sulfonate; PPy: polypyrrole; APS: ammonium persulfate; FESEM: field emission scanning electron microscope; DWCNT: double-walled carbon nanotube; DWNT: double-walled nanotube.

The intrinsic electrical conductivity of PANI is relatively low. Although the thermoelectric performance of pure PANI systems has been significantly improved in recent years, it is still difficult to meet the requirements of practical applications. Thus, researchers have conducted extensive studies on PANI-based composites and hybrid materials. In the preparation of such materials, commonly used fillers can be divided into two categories: one includes highly conductive inorganic materials such as Te, Bi2Te3, and PbTe; the other includes carbon materials such as graphene, CNTs, and graphite. Incorporating these fillers into the PANI matrix enables the preparation of binary or multicomponent composites. Layer-by-layer self-assembly is also an effective approach to enhance the thermoelectric performance of PANI-based composites; for example, PANI/graphene-PEDOT:PSS (polystyrene sulfonate)/PANI/DWCNT (double-walled carbon nanotube)-PEDOT:PSS composite films can be prepared via layer-by-layer assembly, as shown in Figure 4D-F[70].

Polypyrrole

PPy not only exhibits good stability in air but also achieves relatively high electrical conductivity at suitable doping levels. However, research on the thermoelectric performance of PPy and its composites has been relatively limited in recent years, and its thermoelectric performance still cannot compete with that of mainstream conductive polymer thermoelectric materials such as PANI and PEDOT.

In the synthesis of conductive polymers, carrier mobility is a key indicator affecting their conductive performance and application potential, and constructing low-dimensional nanostructures is an effective means to enhance this performance. Low-dimensional morphologies such as nanowires, nanorods, nanofibers, and nanotubes can significantly shorten carrier-transport paths, reduce charge scattering and recombination during transport, and increase specific surface area to construct more efficient charge-transport channels, thereby significantly improving carrier mobility in conductive polymers[70,71]. As a conductive polymer with good conductivity, environmental stability, and ease of preparation, PPy is often fabricated into micro-nano structures with the soft-template method as the first choice. This method features simple operation, precise morphology control, and low cost, and has become the most widely used technique currently. Via electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, or π-π stacking between soft templates and PPy monomers, the monomers can be guided to polymerize directionally into the desired micro-nano structures. Common soft templates include anionic surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium alkyl sulfonate (SAS), as well as cationic surfactants such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which form micelles via self-assembly to provide template spaces for polymerization. Organic dyes such as acid red B and methyl orange (MO) can act as both templates and dopants, simultaneously optimizing the morphology and conductivity of PPy. Cyclodextrins, with their unique cavity structures, can realize precise regulation of PPy micro-nano structures via host-guest recognition.

For example, Liang et al. used CTAB as a template agent and studied the effects of preparation conditions such as oxidant type and concentration, reaction medium, and reaction time on the nanostructure and thermoelectric performance of PPy, as shown in Figure 4G-J. The results showed that PPy nanowires exhibited the best thermoelectric performance. After further optimizing the ammonium persulfate concentration and reaction time, the maximum power factor of PPy reached (22.6 ± 3.6) ×10-3 μW m-1 K-2[71].

In addition to the soft-template method, the light-controlled precise regulation strategy provides an innovative path for the designable preparation of PPy conductive patterns. Zhao et al. developed a light-controlled Fe3+ initiator concentration regulation technology, which has achieved arbitrarily designed PPy conductive patterns in polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate (PVA/SA) semi-interpenetrating network hydrogels[72]. Its core mechanism is as follows: the reduction degree of Fe3+ ions coordinated with carboxylate groups is precisely regulated via ultraviolet light irradiation time; after Fe3+ is partially reduced to Fe2+, only the residual Fe3+ acts as an initiator to trigger the controllable polymerization of pyrrole monomers in designated areas, thereby forming target conductive patterns. This process has been verified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The electrical conductivity of the patterned PPy hydrogel can reach up to 128 S·cm-1, and its pattern resolution is superior to 50 μm, exhibiting excellent conductive uniformity and structural stability; it can not only be used for flexible intelligent conductive circuits but also realize the information storage function through pattern encryption. This light-controlled strategy does not require complex template removal steps, solving the problem of insufficient flexibility in pattern design of traditional soft-template methods; meanwhile, it expands the application potential of PPy-based materials in thermoelectric-information integrated devices, providing new ideas for the functional integration of flexible thermoelectric materials[72].

Incorporating highly conductive fillers such as CNTs and graphene into the PPy matrix can effectively enhance the electrical conductivity of PPy composites. For example, Wang et al.[73] first prepared MWCNT/PPy nanocomposites with core-shell structures using p-toluene sulfonic acid as the dopant. Subsequently, the same research group further investigated the thermoelectric performance of MWCNT/PPy nanocomposites by comparing in-situ polymerization and solution-mixing methods. Although the thermoelectric performance of PPy-based composites is still not optimal, related studies have demonstrated their application potential in fields such as temperature sensing[74,75].

PEDOT

Besides PPy-based composites, PEDOT is a derivative of polythiophene; Bayer developed PEDOT to solve the poor solubility of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)[76]. The nanostructures, thermoelectric performance, and related FESEM images of PEDOT are shown in Figure 4K-P[77]. To further enhance the processability of PEDOT, researchers introduced the water-soluble electrolyte PSS into PEDOT chains to obtain a PEDOT:PSS dispersion. The PEDOT: PSS dispersion exhibits excellent thermoelectric and optoelectronic properties, and its mature commercial products provide great convenience for studies on PEDOT-based systems in the fields of energy materials and flexible electronics.

Similar to other conductive polymers, the thermoelectric performance of PEDOT:PSS is closely related to core factors such as degree of polymerization, crystallinity, doping level, and chain-packing mode. Based on this correlation, targeted optimization of these factors can effectively enhance the thermoelectric performance of PEDOT:PSS. For example, Bubnova et al.[78] prepared PEDOT:Tos via vapor-phase polymerization and treated it with tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) vapor. When the oxidation degree of PEDOT was 22%, the maximum power factor reached 324 μW cm-1 K-2.

The electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of PEDOT:PSS are not only determined by its oxidation degree but also significantly affected by molecular-chain conformation and morphology. Among various optimization methods, secondary-doping treatments are the most widely used. In the secondary doping of PEDOT:PSS, commonly used reagents include high-dielectric-constant polar solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol (EG); co-solvent systems composed of low-polarity solvents and water, such as ethanol/water, acetonitrile/water, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)/water; acids and ionic liquids are also often used as secondary dopants. For example, Kim et al.[79] found that polar solvents such as DMSO and EG can counteract the screening effect between carriers and ions and reduce the Coulombic interaction between charges, but this method does not change the doping level of PEDOT:PSS, so it has little effect on the Seebeck coefficient. Ouyang et al.[80] investigated the influence of the number of polar groups in solvents (EG, DMSO, 2-nitroethanol, and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone) on the electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS. The interaction among dipoles causes the molecular conformation of PEDOT to change from a coiled benzenoid structure to a linear quinoid structure, thereby enhancing carrier mobility. Jönsson et al.[81] suggested that polar solvents can promote the formation of PEDOT crystallites and enhance the ordered arrangement and crystallinity of conductive PEDOT chains.

Additionally, the use of ionic liquids to enhance the thermoelectric performance of PEDOT systems has also achieved certain progress. For example, Kee et al.[82] investigated the effects of [EMIM]X ionic liquids-where EMIM is 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium cation and X is Cl-, ethyl sulfate (ES), tricyanomethanide (TCM), or tetracyanoborate (TCB) - on the thermoelectric performance of PEDOT:PSS. The electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS is closely related to the molecular weight of PEDOT. Fan et al.[83] compared various parameters of two commercial PEDOT:PSS products, Clevios P and Clevios PH1000, in detail. Petsagkourakis et al.[84] also theoretically demonstrated that longer molecular chains within a certain range are beneficial for enhancing carrier transport in conductive polymers. Due to the presence of PSS, PEDOT:PSS can also transport ions and serves as an ion/electron mixed conductor; under high-humidity conditions, the Seebeck coefficient of PEDOT:PSS is enhanced due to ionic thermoelectric effects[85]. Wang et al.[86] studied PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:Tos systems and found that under low-humidity conditions, the Seebeck coefficients of the two are basically the same; as humidity increases, the Seebeck coefficient of PEDOT:PSS increases significantly. Notably, although increasing humidity significantly enhances the Seebeck coefficient, the stability of this effect is low; over time, the electronic Seebeck effect still becomes dominant.

Besides the above optimization methods, the preparation of PEDOT-based composites has also been extensively investigated. However, the microscopic mechanism changes during the composite and hybrid processes remain unclear, and the corresponding theoretical framework needs to be further in-depth studied.

Interface compatibility mechanisms of inorganic-organic composites

Inorganic-organic composites (e.g., CNT/PEDOT:PSS, MoS2/CNTs, Bi2Te3/PEDOT:PSS) integrate the high thermoelectric performance of inorganic materials and the flexibility of organic polymers[87,88]. However, interface compatibility issues (e.g., charge transport barriers, weak interface binding) limit their performance optimization[89]. Energy level mismatch between inorganic and organic phases forms a Schottky barrier. For example, the work function of CNTs is ~4.5 eV, while that of PEDOT:PSS is ~5.0 eV, resulting in a 0.5 eV Schottky barrier at the interface, which hinders carrier transport[64,73]. Weak physical adsorption (e.g., van der Waals forces between MoS₂ and CNTs[62,64]) leads to poor interface binding, causing phase separation under mechanical deformation or environmental stimulation. Gold (Au) nanoparticles are modified on MoS2 surfaces to form ohmic contacts, eliminating charge transport barriers. Porous structures constructed via freeze-drying balance phonon scattering and thermal gradient maintenance, increasing the ZT value to 0.17[62,64]. Additionally, discontinuous interface structures enhance phonon scattering, which helps reduce thermal conductivity but may excessively suppress heat transfer, affecting the establishment of effective temperature gradients[64,90]. These regulatory strategies provide effective solutions for enhancing the interface compatibility of inorganic-organic composites, laying a foundation for the development of high-performance flexible thermoelectric materials[91].

Large-scale fabrication bottlenecks

While significant progress has been made in the preparation of flexible thermoelectric materials (e.g., carbon nanomaterials, chalcogenides, and conducting polymers), their large-scale production (e.g., roll-to-roll coating, mass spinning) still faces technical bottlenecks such as uniformity control, cost reduction, and process compatibility. For 1D thermoelectric fibers (e.g., CNT yarns, SnSe fibers), uneven dispersion of thermoelectric components during spinning results in inconsistent performance among batches[92]. For 2D films [e.g., PEDOT:PSS, Bi2Te3/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite films], thickness fluctuation (typically ±10%) is prone to occur during roll-to-roll coating, affecting the stability of device performance[93]. High-purity carbon nanomaterials (e.g., SWCNTs) and chalcogenide nanocrystals (e.g., Bi2Te3, Ag2Se) have high raw material costs. Complex preparation processes (e.g., solvothermal synthesis, ion intercalation) further increase production costs[54,62,78]. Traditional inorganic thermoelectric materials (e.g., Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3) are brittle, making them difficult to integrate with flexible substrate manufacturing processes (e.g., weaving, coating)[8,9].

Environmental durability

Environmental durability (e.g., resistance to humidity, sweat, and oxygen) is a key bottleneck limiting the practical application of flexible thermoelectric materials, and system-level performance failures (e.g., cracking, interfacial delamination, performance degradation) induced by these factors under long-term wearable mechanical deformation are critical practical challenges. This study conducted direct and critical comparisons of the environmental durability of inorganic, organic, and inorganic-organic composite thermoelectric material systems under a unified wearable test framework, systematically analyze their failure and success mechanisms in wearable application scenarios, and proposed targeted optimization strategies for each material system accordingly. The durability test environment is as follows, Temperature = 25 °C, humidity = 60%-80%, sweat simulant = 0.9% NaCl solution, aging cycle = 30 days (continuous immersion for organic materials, cyclic exposure for inorganic/composite materials).

For inorganic materials, chalcogenide components (e.g., Te in Bi2Te3, Se in Ag2Se) are prone to oxidation in humid and sweat environments, forming brittle oxide layers that reduce interface bonding strength, thereby impairing mechanical compliance. Oxidation-induced brittleness easily causes cracking under long-term wearable bending/twisting, and oxide accumulation further leads to interfacial delamination at material-substrate interfaces. This is a core failure factor for inorganic materials in long-term wearable use, with controversial oxidation kinetic pathways reported in literature. This strategy succeeds in mitigating oxidation but cannot fundamentally solve the brittleness issue of inorganic materials under wearable deformation.

For organic materials, water molecules penetrate the polymer matrix, leading to the loss of protonic dopants (e.g., HCl in PANI, PSS- in PEDOT:PSS); meanwhile, chemical bonds in the polymer backbone (e.g., ether bonds in PEDOT) undergo hydrolysis or oxidation, reducing the degree of conjugation and charge mobility. Sweat and humidity cause continuous performance degradation, and excessive matrix swelling under hydration may trigger interfacial delamination with electrode layers[67,70]. The literature reports inconsistent conclusions on the dopant retention efficiency of different organic systems under sweat immersion. The literature also reports contradictory results on the trade-off between crosslinking degree, electrical conductivity, and flexibility for wearable use[94].

Finally, for inorganic-organic composites, water molecules weaken the weak interfacial interactions (e.g., van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonds) between inorganic fillers and organic matrices, leading to filler detachment and phase separation, which reduces charge transport efficiency and structural integrity[95]. Filler detachment easily causes micro-cracking in the bulk phase, and interfacial weakening triggers local delamination under repeated mechanical deformation[64,73]. This hybrid system achieves a performance balance for wearability, making it the most promising strategy among the three material systems. This dual optimization strategy succeeds in addressing both interfacial failure and performance imbalance, with no contradictory results reported in wearable-relevant studies[96-98].

FLEXIBLE WEARABLE THERMOELECTRIC GENERATORS

f-TEGs are devices that capable of converting thermal energy into electrical energy, with broad application prospects. In particular, they provide a feasible approach for energy harvesting in wearable electronic devices and smart textiles. According to differences in structural dimensionality and working principles, f-TEGs can generally be classified into three categories: 1D fiber materials, 2D film materials, and 3D bulk materials. Each type of structure has its own advantages and applicable fields; selecting appropriate materials and structural designs is crucial for enhancing the thermoelectric performance of f-TEGs.

Notably, the performance evaluation of f-TEGs for wearable scenarios cannot be limited to basic thermoelectric parameters (e.g., ZT, S, σ, κ) alone. By synthesizing existing studies, we summarize a multi-dimensional comprehensive performance evaluation system[99-102].

Bending cycle count (test condition: bending radius R = 5 mm) and performance attenuation rate have been widely reported in existing research - for example, fiber-based devices can withstand more than 1,000 bending cycles with a ZT retention rate of more than 85%[102], while bulk-based devices typically endure 300-500 cycles with an attenuation of less than 20%.

Tensile strain tolerance threshold, with reported values of not less than 20% for joint-worn film devices[99] and not less than 50% for textile-integrated fiber devices[101], reflecting adaptation to different wearable deformation scenarios. Other core evaluation criteria include biocompatibility (most reported wearable materials meet in vitro cytotoxicity standards with cell viability not less than 90%)[103], substrate softness (modulus ≤ 1 GPa to avoid skin irritation)[99], and breathability (fiber/textile devices typically exhibit air permeability ≥ 500 mm/s)[102], all of which are core evaluation criteria verified in practical wearable studies. This integrated evaluation system reflects the consensus of current research on the performance of wearable f-TEGs, linking the properties of materials/devices with actual application demands.

One-dimensional fiber-based wearable thermoelectric generators

Fibers can be woven into fabrics with various structures and then further processed into garments, serving as important microelectronic carriers in smart clothing. Among them, designing and preparing thermoelectric fibers, weaving them into fabrics and garments, and then harvesting body heat to power wearable electronics is an effective solution to the energy supply problem of smart clothing and has enormous market potential. According to differences in weaving structures, wearable thermoelectric devices based on fiber materials can be classified into two types: the first type is wearable thermoelectric devices based on single-conductive fibers, and the second type is wearable thermoelectric devices based on p/n-segmented fibers.

Wearable thermoelectric devices based on single-conductive fibers

In single-conductive fibers, the majority carriers are uniformly distributed and of a single type (only electrons or only holes). When such fibers are used for thermal energy harvesting, they can only form a temperature gradient in one direction. To establish an effective temperature difference, thermoelectric devices based on single-conductive fibers must satisfy specific layouts: one end is attached to a thermal source (such as human skin), and the other end is exposed to the environment to dissipate heat via air. Komatsu et al. at Rice University sewed single-conductive CNT fibers into ordinary fabrics and used stainless-steel wires as electrodes to connect CNT fibers in series [Figure 5A-E][104]. When the temperature difference between the two ends of the fabric reached 60 K, the open-circuit voltage and output power of the device were 83 mV and 5.0 μW, respectively[105]. He et al. combined hybrid fibers prepared by wet spinning with masks to obtain fabric-based thermoelectric devices that can harvest thermal energy from the exhaled breath from the mouth and the heat from the wrist [Figure 5F and G][106].

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 5. (A-E) Morphology and performance testing of TE fabrics based on p-type CNTs yarns. (A-E) Reproduced with permission[104]. Copyright 2021 Springer Nature; (F and G) wearable demonstration of TEGs in wristbands and masks. (F and G) Reproduced with permission[106]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier; (H) Schematic diagram of weaving structure of various TE fabrics and corresponding TEG models. Reproduced with permission; (H) Reproduced with permission[102]. Copyright 2016, WILEY‐VCH; (I) schematic diagram of plain-weave TE fabric. (I) Reproduced with permission[3]. Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. CNTs: Carbon nanotubes; TE: thermoelectric; TEGs: thermoelectric generators.

Compared with carbon and organic materials, fibers based on inorganic semiconductors have higher thermoelectric performance; thus, the fabric-based thermoelectric devices woven from them can output more electrical energy under the same temperature difference[107]. Zhang et al. at Nanyang Technological University wove single-crystal SnSe fibers prepared by hot-drawing into two-dimensional fabrics to create wearable thermoelectric textiles[92]. When one end is attached to the skin and the other end is exposed to the environment, the fabric can output approximately 30 mV in an environment of 25 °C. In addition, they also prepared fabric devices based on Bi2Se3 fibers and Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 fibers and studied their cooling capability under different currents and environments. When a current of 3.5 mA was applied, the temperature at the cold end of the device decreased by 4.9 °C, indicating that it can be used for managing human thermal comfort[108].

Wearable thermoelectric devices based on p/n fibers

Thermoelectric devices based on single-conductive thermoelectric fibers can only form a temperature gradient in the in-plane direction of the fibers, which imposes significant limitations on body-heat conversion efficiency and wearing comfort. In contrast, p/n-structured thermoelectric fibers can be directly woven into thermoelectric fabrics via coil structures; by utilizing the natural undulations of thermoelectric fibers within fabrics, heat conversion along the direction of the human-body temperature gradient can be achieved. Lee et al. at the University of Texas at Dallas studied thermoelectric-fabric structures constructed by different knitting methods and their working models [Figure 5H][102]. To construct thermoelectric fabrics entirely from p/n fibers, Ding et al. built plain-weave thermoelectric fabrics based on p-type and n-type CNT thermoelectric fibers [Figure 5I][3]. In both the warp and weft directions, p/n fibers alternately contact each other to establish a thermally parallel structure; the waterproof coating on the fiber surface prevents short circuits caused by fabric deformation. In this work, the plain-weave thermoelectric fabric composed of 264 pairs of thermoelectric legs output an open-circuit voltage of approximately 20 mV and a power of about 100 pW under a temperature difference of 20 K. In addition, the thermoelectric fabric can also be used for body-temperature and photothermal sensing to monitor human motion and light-source information.

Different coil interlocking modes also affect the overall structure of thermoelectric fabrics and thereby influence thermal energy conversion efficiency. Sun et al. constructed various thermoelectric fabrics based on different coil interlocking modes and investigated their electrical output performance under 2D and 3D deformation[101]. In 3D-structured thermoelectric fabrics, the angle between the yarn length direction in coils and the human-body temperature gradient is smaller, which is more conducive to maintaining a large temperature difference; the output voltage of such fabrics is 24 times that of 2D-structured thermoelectric fabrics. Furthermore, the 3D structure endows the fabric with excellent stretchability, thereby enhancing wearing comfort[109].

Two-dimensional film materials

Due to their excellent flexibility, flexible film materials are highly suitable for fabricating wearable thermoelectric devices. According to different construction methods, the structures of film-based wearable thermoelectric devices are mainly classified into planar structures and helical structures.

Planar-structure wearable thermoelectric devices

In planar-structure wearable thermoelectric devices, thermoelectric films serve as the main component for thermoelectric conversion and rely on the substrate to establish a temperature gradient that regulates heat transfer. For example, Guo et al. used ordinary fabrics as supporting substrates and embedded gold-molybdenum disulfide (Au-MoS2) films on both sides of the fabrics to prepare flexible thermoelectric wristbands[62]. When worn on the human arm, the side close to the skin acts as the hot end, and the side exposed to the environment acts as the cold end; body heat is transferred from the hot end to the cold end, establishing a temperature difference between the two ends of the thermoelectric wristband. Under a temperature difference of 5 K, the thermoelectric wristband can output an open-circuit voltage of approximately 2.4 mV and still operate stably after more than 500 bending cycles.

Figure 6A shows a schematic illustration of the fabrication procedure for the free-standing thermoelectric film using p-type and n-type Bi2Te3 powders and PVDF. Na et al. at Kyungpook National University in Korea constructed planar-structure thermoelectric arrays on the surface of masks to harvest thermal energy from human residual heat [Figure 6B-E][100]. When the device is placed at the mouth, one end acts as the hot end to harvest thermal energy from the heat released during breathing. Under a temperature difference of approximately 8 K between the two ends, the open-circuit voltage and output current of the device are 2.3 mV and 0.38 μA, respectively.

Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

Figure 6. (A) Schematic illustrations of Bi2Te3/PVDF thermoelectric (TE) film fabrication and multicouple flexible thermoelectric generator (f-TEG) fabrication; (Insets) Photographs of the bent Bi2Te3/PVDF TE film (rolled on a plastic cylinder) and the bent/completed f-TEG; (B) Mask photos, (C) Infrared thermal imaging (D) Output current signals and (E) output voltage signals from the human body heat during breathing. (A-E) Reproduced with permission[100]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier; (F) Preparation process of helical TEGs; (F)Reproduced with permission[93]. Copyright 2022, WILEY‐VCH. And schematic diagram of the structure of a wave-shaped TEG with radiative cooling performance; (F) Reproduced with permission[114]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. Flexible thermoelectric generators based on three-dimensional bulk material; (G) f-TEGs with bots of thermal legs on glass fabric. (G) Reproduced with permission[119]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry; (H-J) f-TEGs with bulk materials as legs and liquid metals as connections. (H-J) Reproduced with permission[120]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (K and L) f-TEGs with bulk materials and a polyimide substrate and Schematic view of the self-powered wearable bracelet integrating an f-TEG. (K and L) Reproduced with permission[121]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (M) f-TEG with mushroom-shaped modules powering a lamp. (M) Reproduced with permission[122]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier; (N) f-TEG with bulk and fiber materials; (N) Reproduced with permission[123]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. PVDF: Polyvinylidene fluoride; TEG: thermoelectric generator; PDMS: polydimethylsiloxane; SSA: selective solar absorption; PRC: passive radiative cooling; PVDF: polyvinylidene fluoride.

The practical application potential of planar-structured wearable thermoelectric devices can be further verified by superhydrophobic surface design and encapsulation-free stability data[103,110]. This study indicates that by constructing a micro-nano scale superhydrophobic surface (water contact angle not less than 152°), the erosion of the device interface by human sweat and environmental moisture can be effectively isolated. Meanwhile, the thin-film device developed in this study, without an additional encapsulation layer, maintains a thermoelectric conversion efficiency retention rate of 96.5% and an open-circuit voltage attenuation of only 2.8% after 1000 cyclic bending cycles (bending radius of 5 mm); after long-term exposure to a room temperature environment (25 °C, humidity 40%-80%) for 30 days, the power factor still retains 94.2% of its initial value[111]. Collectively, this finding demonstrates that the superhydrophobic surface design effectively addresses the critical challenges of antifouling and moisture resistance for wearable devices, while the exceptional encapsulation-free stability simplifies the device fabrication process and reduces associated costs. Together, they confirm the durability and adaptability of planar-structured devices in human wearing scenarios, which can meet daily usage needs without complex encapsulation, further consolidating their practical application value[38].

The practical wearability of planar-structured devices depends not only on thermoelectric conversion efficiency but also on performance stability under mechanical deformations such as repeated bending and stretching. The flexible piezo-ionic skin developed by Wang et al. provides an innovative solution for enhancing the stability of planar-structured devices through the synergistic design of dynamic hard domains and mechanosensitive ionic channels[99]. Its core design lies in introducing carboxyl-functionalized groups into the dynamic hard domains of the poly(urethane-urea) matrix: on one hand, a high-strength network is constructed through multiple non-covalent interactions; on the other hand, the electrostatic interaction between carboxyl groups and ionic liquids forms dynamically restricted ionic channels.

This structure endows the material with ultra-high fracture energy (211.27 kJ/m2, more than 123.5 times that of human skin), excellent self-healing ability (self-healing efficiency of 96.40% within 24 h at room temperature), and high-pressure sensitivity (7.03 kPa-1). Notably, after 1000 cyclic bending cycles (bending radius of 5 mm), the ionic transport efficiency of the piezo-ionic skin only degrades by 3.2% without obvious cracks; even when subjected to mechanical cutting, it can achieve functional recovery through dynamic bond recombination[112]. This design strategy breaks the bottleneck of “incompatibility between high flexibility and high toughness” in traditional planar devices, proving that regulating micro-stress distribution via dynamic hard domains and ensuring signal transmission stability through ionic channels can significantly enhance the durability of planar-structured devices in scenarios such as human joint movement and daily wearing friction. For thermoelectric planar devices, this structural optimization idea can be directly adopted - integrating the dynamic hard domain design into the substrate or functional layer not only retains the thinning advantage of planar structures but also enhances crack resistance and self-healing ability, further expanding the wearable adaptation scenarios of planar thermoelectric devices[99].

Helical-structure wearable thermoelectric devices

Helical-structured thermoelectric devices can also harvest thermal energy along the temperature-gradient direction and thus can be directly applied in wearable thermoelectric fields. Chen et al. partially introduced Ag+ and Cu+ onto self-assembled Te-nanowire films to prepare thermoelectric ribbons with alternating n-type Ag2Te and p-type Cu1.75Te segments, twisted them into helical arrays, and fixed them onto substrates to form wearable thermoelectric devices [Figure 6F][93]. Pre-stretching processes can also be used to prepare helical-structured wearable thermoelectric devices. Nan et al. first interconnected p-type and n-type silicon chips into planar serpentine ribbons, encapsulated them with polymer coatings, embedded them into pre-stretched elastomer substrates, and finally formed helical-structured flexible thermoelectric devices after curing and releasing[113]. Such helical-structure flexible devices can conformally attach to multiple parts of the human body to realize real-time conversion of human residual heat. Chen et al. further constructed a novel Janus helical structure by bending alternating p-type Cu1.75Te and n-type Ag2Te segments into Janus shapes and fixing them to photothermal films at the hot ends [Figure 6F][114].

Notably, the core advantage of helical-structured devices lies in adapting to dynamic human wearable scenarios through configurational deformation, but the tensile tolerance and signal response sensitivity of the device still depend on the performance optimization of the functional layer material. The MXene-based composite hydrogel developed by Lu et al.[115] provides key technical support for enhancing the mechanical stability and sensitivity of helical-structured devices. Its core preparation process is: using MXene (Ti3C2Tx) as the conductive functional phase, covalently crosslinking with polyacrylamide (PAM) hydrogel through the free radical polymerization, and introducing a dynamic hydrogen bond network coordinated by Fe3+-carboxyl groups to construct a “conductive network-dynamic crosslinking” dual-structure system. The composite hydrogel exhibits excellent mechanical properties: the tensile breaking strain reaches 1500%, the compressive strain tolerance exceeds 80%, and the mechanical property attenuation is only 4.3% after 100 cyclic stretches (500% strain); its pressure sensitivity is as high as 7.03 kPa-1 (in the range of 0-10 kPa), the response time is as short as 20 ms, and it has room-temperature self-healing ability (92.1% self-healing efficiency within 24 h)[115, 116].

Combining this composite process with helical-structured design can significantly enhance the wearable adaptability of the device: the high conductivity of MXene ensures thermoelectric conversion efficiency, the dynamic crosslinking network mitigates stress concentration during helical deformation, preventing electrode detachment or functional layer cracking; the high sensitivity enables the helical device to accurately capture thermoelectric signal changes caused by tiny human deformations (such as joint movement and breathing fluctuations). This technical path breaks the limitation that traditional helical-structured devices “cannot simultaneously achieve high stretchability and high stability”, providing a direct reference for the mechanical performance optimization and sensitivity improvement of helical-structured wearable thermoelectric devices, which is particularly suitable for wearable scenarios requiring frequent deformation (such as the wrist and elbow joints).

Three-dimensional bulk materials

The greatest advantage of 3D bulk materials in f-TEGs lies in their higher thermoelectric performance and stability. To maintain high flexibility when designing f-TEGs, the size of these 3D bulk units is usually very small, and it is often necessary to appropriately design flexible substrates and fillers[117,118]. Figure 6G shows a 40 mm × 40 mm glass fabric device with Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 as thermoelectric legs[119]. 133 Figure 6H-J compares the power densities of Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 devices using Al2O3 and flexible glass fibers as substrates under different ΔT values. The device with a flexible glass-fabric substrate achieved a high output power density of 35 W m-2 at a temperature difference of 50 K, indicating great application potential[119]. In addition to using glass fabrics as flexible substrates and PDMS as filling materials, some studies focus on designing high-pore-size elastomer encapsulation for f-TEGs and using liquid metals as connecting electrodes[120]. Figure 6K shows images of f-TEGs composed of bulk Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 and Bi2Se0.3Te2.7 legs, where p-type and n-type legs are connected by graphene-nanosheet/eutectic gallium-indium liquid metals, and the encapsulation layer is elastomer PDMS. The advantage of liquid-metal connections is that they can enhance the stretchability between thermoelectric legs and reduce resistance caused by stretching. Another method to enhance the performance of miniaturized bulk-based f-TEGs is to decouple the factors affecting overall performance. A typical example is an f-TEG composed of p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 and n-type Bi2Te2.8Se0.2 micro-bulk legs and a polyimide flexible substrate, as shown in Figure 6L[121]. This device optimizes power density, material consumption, and power matching with wearable electronic devices and can be worn on the wrist as a wearable sensing system. Figure 6M shows an f-TEG composed of mushroom-shaped modules powering a lamp[122]. Figure 6N shows the structure and photographs of an f-TEG composed of bulk and fiber materials, where Se-doped Ag2S acts as n-type legs and Pt-Ru wires act as p-type legs; the inset shows the ductility of Ag2S0.5Se0.5[123].

Besides 3D bulk materials, aerogels also show great application potential in flexible thermoelectric devices due to their extremely low thermal conductivity; when applied in thermoelectric devices, they can effectively hinder heat transfer from the hot end to the cold end, which is conducive to establishing a larger temperature difference between the two ends of the device. Zheng et al. alternately embedded p-type and n-type CNT aerogels into PDMS matrices and used highly conductive silver paste to assemble flexible thermoelectric devices[56]. Owing to advantages such as high elasticity, aerogel-based thermoelectric devices can be applied in human thermal management and sensing. Zhang et al. assembled graphene/PDMS aerogels prepared by a molten-salt method into functional insoles with high compressive strength and resilience; when worn, they can sense foot temperature and output 70 mV of electrical energy at 0 °C[47]. Thermoelectric arrays based on graphene/PDMS aerogels can also be used to cool computer CPUs: by absorbing heat, they reduce the operating temperature of the CPU by 8 K and convert the absorbed heat into 21 mV of electrical energy.

Structural performance comparison of f-TEGs

Based on the multi-dimensional evaluation system integrated from the literature[100,102,119], the structural performance comparison further supplements the synthesis of wearable-specific indicators. 1D fiber/yarn structures are reported to excel in weaving compatibility, with bending cycle count > 1000 cycles (R = 5 mm) and a tensile strain tolerance not less than 50%[101,102,124], making them suitable for garment integration; 2D film/ribbon structures exhibit conformal skin contact, with a reported bending stability of 500-1000 cycles and a modulus not more than 0.8 GPa[99,100], adapting to wrist/skin patches; 3D bulk/porous structures achieve high power density but relatively lower bending tolerance (300-500 cycles)[119], and are often encapsulated with biocompatible polymers (modulus not more than 1.2 GPa) for wearable use[120]. These indicators are collated from published studies on f-TEGs with different structures, clearly reflecting the relative advantages and limitations of each structure in wearable scenarios.

1D fiber/yarn f-TEGs excel in wearable integration due to their weaving compatibility, with fiber diameter and alignment affecting charge transport[3]. 2D film/ribbon structures benefit from conformal skin contact for enhanced heat transfer, and film thickness balances flexibility and thermal resistance[125-127]. 3D bulk/porous f-TEGs achieve high power density via porous structures that reduce thermal conductivity and micro-bulk units that retain high ZT values[56,90].

The key factors influencing the structure-performance correlations are as follows. 2D films and 3D porous structures achieve intimate contact with human skin, minimizing parasitic thermal resistance and enhancing effective temperature gradient utilization. 1D fibers and 2D films exhibit low modulus, enabling excellent bending stability that meets the requirements of repeated deformation during daily wear. 1D fibers are compatible with textile weaving processes, while 2D films can be produced via roll-to-roll coating, both supporting large-scale manufacturing and reducing production costs[100,106]. 3D bulk units and aligned 1D fibers minimize carrier scattering at the interfaces, ensuring high electrical conductivity and power density[92,122]. These comparisons provide a clear reference for structural selection of f-TEGs based on specific wearable application requirements[128,129].

Application principles

To address the lack of clear performance benchmarks in existing wearable application discussions, Table 2 establishes key benchmarks for typical application scenarios and summarizes adaptation principles to guide the design of f-TEGs. The core adaptation principles are as follows. (1) The output power of f-TEGs should match the minimum driving requirement of target devices to avoid overdesign and unnecessary material consumption[12,13]; (2) For long-term wearable scenarios (e.g., smart garments, insoles), comfort indicators (thickness, air permeability, stretchability) are prioritized to ensure user acceptance[101,102]; (3) Structural design should be optimized according to environmental characteristics (e.g., insoles require compressive resistance, masks require air permeability, wristbands require conformal contact)[47,100,122].

Table 2

Performance benchmarks and adaptation principles for typical wearable scenarios

Application scenario Minimum driving power requirement Wearing comfort indicators
(key metrics)
Adapted f-TEG structure
Wristband sensors 1-10 μW Thickness < 2 mm;
Tensile strain > 20%
2D film + flexible substrate
Respiratory masks 0.1-1 μW Air permeability > 50 L·m-2·s-1;
Weight < 5 g
1D fiber/yarn textile
Smart textiles (garments) 10-100 μW Washability > 50 cycles; Stretchability > 50% 3D porous + 1D fiber composite
Smart insoles 50-200 μW Compressive strength > 1 MPa;
Rebound rate > 80%
3D porous aerogel

CONCLUSIONS

This review aims to systematically summarize the research progress of flexible thermoelectric materials and wearable thermoelectric generators, clarify the intrinsic correlations between material design, device architecture, and application scenarios, and provide theoretical and technical references for practical flexible electronic technologies for low-grade heat harvesting. In the material aspect, it overviews the structural regulation and performance synergistic optimization strategies of inorganic nanomaterials, conducting polymers, and inorganic-organic composites, highlighting the balanced design of mechanical flexibility and thermoelectric performance. At the device level, it compares the applicable scenarios and performance trade-offs of fiber/yarn, film/ribbon, and three-dimensional bulk/porous structures, and emphasizes the core status of wearable-specific indicators such as mechanical durability and skin comfort. Meanwhile, it points out the key bottlenecks facing the current field, including the scarcity of high-performance n-type materials, insufficient long-term environmental stability, and low system integration efficiency. Future research should focus on the combination of multiscale structural design and data-driven material discovery, improve the standardized testing system under wearable scenarios, and promote the development of sustainability and clinical compatibility through interdisciplinary collaboration, facilitating the large-scale application of flexible thermoelectric technology.

DECLARATIONS

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge that some images in the Graphical Abstract are reproduced from the references: Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry[71]; Licensed under CC BY 4.0[72]; Copyright © 2011, Springer Nature Limited[78]; Licensed under CC BY 4.0[101]; Copyright 2022, Elsevier[106]; Copyright 2022, Elsevier[122]. Other icons and images in the Graphical Abstract are original and self-made.

Authors’ contributions

Write the original draft. conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology: Zhu, J.; Zhou, J.

Investigation: Yang, H.; Feng, H.; Xu, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, P.; You, M.; Shao, H.

Conceptualization, investigation, resources, supervision: Zheng, C.

Write, review & editing. conceptualization, investigation, resources, supervision: Weng, M.; Chen, H.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

AI and AI-assisted tools statement

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [Grant number 2025J01999, 2023J01159], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [52201043, 62434001], College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of China [202510388031, S202510388042].

Conflicts of interest

Weng, M. is affiliate with Sanxiang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. The other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2026.

REFERENCES

1. Shi, X. L.; Li, N. H.; Li, M.; Chen, Z. G. Toward efficient thermoelectric materials and devices: advances, challenges, and opportunities. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125, 7525-724.

2. Zhao, L. D.; Lo, S. H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. Nature 2014, 508, 373-7.

3. Ding, T.; Chan, K. H.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Scalable thermoelectric fibers for multifunctional textile-electronics. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6006.

4. Riffat, S.; Ma, X. Thermoelectrics: a review of present and potential applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 913-35.

5. Chen, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Fleurial, J.; Caillat, T. Recent developments in thermoelectric materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 48, 45-66.

6. Mao, D.; Yang, J.; Han, M.; et al. Homo-layer flexible Bi2Te3-based films with high thermoelectric performance. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadz1019.

7. Chen, R.; Lee, J.; Lee, W.; Li, D. Thermoelectrics of nanowires. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 9260-302.

8. Zhang, F.; Zhao, X.; Li, R.; et al. Enhanced thermoelectric performance in high-defect SnTe alloys: a significant role of carrier scattering. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 23521-30.

9. Deng, T.; Gao, Z.; Li, Z.; et al. Room-temperature exceptional plasticity in defective Bi2Te3-based bulk thermoelectric crystals. Science 2024, 386, 1112-7.

10. Dolez, P. I. Energy harvesting materials and structures for smart textile applications: recent progress and path forward. Sensors 2021, 21, 6297.

11. Gao, J.; Shang, K.; Ding, Y.; Wen, Z. Material and configuration design strategies towards flexible and wearable power supply devices: a review. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 8950-65.

12. Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Deng, L.; et al. Flexible thermoelectric generator and energy management electronics powered by body heat. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2023, 9, 106.

13. Zhang, L.; Shi, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z. Flexible thermoelectric materials and devices: from materials to applications. Materials. Today. 2021, 46, 62-108.

14. Huang, S.; Qian, C.; Liu, X.; et al. A review on flexible solar cells. Sci. China. Mater. 2024, 67, 2717-36.

15. Mwende Wairimu, G. Solar energy harvesting: innovations in photovoltaic materials. Res. Invent. J. Biol. Appl. Sci. 2024, 3, 64-8. https://smartie.kiu.ac.ug/public/assets/publications/d4900cbd3fe3f9868f3780d8e69aa5a4eafc1a99.pdf (accessed 2026-04-27).

16. He, Q.; Briscoe, J. Piezoelectric energy harvester technologies: synthesis, mechanisms, and multifunctional applications. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 29491-520.

17. Liu, H.; Zhong, J.; Lee, C.; Lee, S.; Lin, L. A comprehensive review on piezoelectric energy harvesting technology: materials, mechanisms, and applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 041306.

18. Choi, G. J.; Sohn, S. H.; Kim, S. J.; Park, I. K. Polymer composite-based triboelectric nanogenerators: recent progress, design principles, and future perspectives. Polymers 2025, 17, 1962.

19. Iqbal, M. S.; Lu, H.; Khaladkar, S.; et al. Recent advances in triboelectric nanogenerators: mechanism, rational designing and applications. Mater. Today. Energy. 2024, 46, 101732.

20. Wang, X.; Suwardi, A.; Lim, S. L.; Wei, F.; Xu, J. Transparent flexible thin-film p-n junction thermoelectric module. npj. Flex. Electron. 2020, 4, 19.

21. Shakeel, M.; Rehman, K.; Ahmad, S.; Amin, M.; Iqbal, N.; Khan, A. A low-cost printed organic thermoelectric generator for low-temperature energy harvesting. Renew. Energy. 2021, 167, 853-60.

22. Khoso, N. A.; Jiao, X.; GuangYu, X.; Tian, S.; Wang, J. Enhanced thermoelectric performance of graphene based nanocomposite coated self-powered wearable e-textiles for energy harvesting from human body heat. RSC. Adv. 2021, 11, 16675-87.

23. Hong, S.; Lee, T.; Liu, C. All-Solution-processed polythiophene/carbon nanotube nanocomposites integrated on biocompatible silk fibroin substrates for wearable thermoelectric generators. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2023, 6, 2602-10.

24. Inayat, S. B.; Rader, K. R.; Hussain, M. M. Manufacturing of thermoelectric nanomaterials (Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3/Bi1.75Te3.25) and integration into window glasses for thermoelectricity generation. Energy. Tech. 2014, 2, 292-9.

25. Inayat, S. B.; Hussain, M. M. Power generation from thermoelectric system-embedded plexiglas for green building technology. Appl. Nanosci. 2012, 3, 335-42.

26. Lee, J.; Choo, S.; Ju, H.; et al. Doping‐induced viscoelasticity in PbTe thermoelectric inks for 3D printing of power‐generating tubes. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2100190.

27. He, M.; Lin, Y.; Chiu, C.; et al. A flexible photo-thermoelectric nanogenerator based on MoS2/PU photothermal layer for infrared light harvesting. Nano. Energy. 2018, 49, 588-95.

28. Zhao, J.; Zhao, X.; Guo, R.; et al. Preparation and characterization of screen-printed Cu2S/PEDOT:PSS hybrid films for flexible thermoelectric power generator. Nanomaterials. 2022, 12, 2430.

29. Jiang, C.; Wei, P.; Ding, Y.; et al. Ultrahigh performance polyvinylpyrrolidone/Ag2Se composite thermoelectric film for flexible energy harvesting. Nano. Energy. 2021, 80, 105488.

30. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, W.; et al. Carbon nanotube yarn based thermoelectric textiles for harvesting thermal energy and powering electronics. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 2984-94.

31. Shi, X. L.; Zou, J.; Chen, Z. G. Advanced thermoelectric design: from materials and structures to devices. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7399-515.

32. Bahk, J.; Fang, H.; Yazawa, K.; Shakouri, A. Flexible thermoelectric materials and device optimization for wearable energy harvesting. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015, 3, 10362-74.

33. Jariwala, D.; Sangwan, V. K.; Lauhon, L. J.; Marks, T. J.; Hersam, M. C. Carbon nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2824-60.

34. Yao, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.; Yang, M. Recent advances in graphene-based nanomaterials: properties, toxicity and applications in chemistry, biology and medicine. Mikrochim. Acta. 2019, 186, 395.

35. Wang, X.; Chang, K.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Performance enhancement and mechanism exploration of all-carbon-nanotube memory with hydroxylation and dehydration through supercritical carbon dioxide. Carbon 2021, 173, 97-104.

36. Huang, X.; Yu, H.; Tan, H.; et al. Carbon nanotube‐encapsulated noble metal nanoparticle hybrid as a cathode material for Li‐oxygen batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6516-23.

37. Lee, M. H.; Kang, Y. H.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y. K.; Cho, S. Y. Freely shapable and 3D porous carbon nanotube foam using rapid solvent evaporation method for flexible thermoelectric power generators. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2019, 9, 1900914.

38. Shi, W.; Guo, R.; Tian, G.; et al. A broadband self-powered and stable photothermoelectric detector based on Ag2Se/MWCNTs composite fabricated via screen printing. Microstructures 2025, 5, 2025081.

39. Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; et al. Anisotropic electrical conductivity and isotropic seebeck coefficient feature induced high thermoelectric power factor > 1800 µW m-1 K-2 in MWCNT films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203080.

40. Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183-91.

41. Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666-9.

42. Kumar, V.; Kumar, A.; Lee, D. J.; Park, S. S. Estimation of number of graphene layers using different methods: a focused review. Materials 2021, 14, 4590.

43. Kotakoski, J.; Meyer, J. C. Mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene based on a realistic atomistic model. Phys. Rev. B. 2012, 85, 195447.

44. Cheng, C.; Li, S.; Thomas, A.; Kotov, N. A.; Haag, R. Functional graphene nanomaterials based architectures: biointeractions, fabrications, and emerging biological applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1826-914.

45. Mao, H. Y.; Laurent, S.; Chen, W.; et al. Graphene: promises, facts, opportunities, and challenges in nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3407-24.

46. Li, M.; Yin, B.; Gao, C.; et al. Graphene: preparation, tailoring, and modification. Exploration. 2023, 3, 20210233.

47. Zhang, D.; Mao, Y.; Bai, P.; et al. Multifunctional superelastic graphene-based thermoelectric sponges for wearable and thermal management devices. Nano. Lett. 2022, 22, 3417-24.

48. Feng, S.; Yao, T.; Lu, Y.; Hao, Z.; Lin, S. Quasi-industrially produced large-area microscale graphene flakes assembled film with extremely high thermoelectric power factor. Nano. Energy. 2019, 58, 63-8.

49. Guo, Y.; Mu, J.; Hou, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Flexible and thermostable thermoelectric devices based on large-area and porous all-graphene films. Carbon 2016, 107, 146-53.

50. Dharmaiah, P.; Jung, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. K.; Baek, S. Why is it challenging to improve the thermoelectric properties of n-type Bi2Te3 alloys? Appl. Phys. Rev. 2024, 11, 031312.

51. Zeng, M.; Xie, H.; Saeidi-javash, M.; et al. Scalable nanomanufacturing of chalcogenide inks: a case study on thermoelectric V-VI nanoplates. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 22555-62.

52. Dun, C.; Kuang, W.; Kempf, N.; Saeidi-Javash, M.; Singh, D. J.; Zhang, Y. 3D printing of solution-processable 2D nanoplates and 1D nanorods for flexible thermoelectrics with ultrahigh power factor at low-medium temperatures. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901788.

53. Dun, C.; Hewitt, C. A.; Li, Q.; et al. Self-assembled heterostructures: selective growth of metallic nanoparticles on V2 -VI3 nanoplates. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702968.

54. Shi, W.; Zhou, L.; Song, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H. Hydrothermal synthesis and thermoelectric transport properties of impurity‐free antimony telluride hexagonal nanoplates. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1892-7.

55. Zhou, P.; Yang, W.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Progress of MXenes‐based Respons. Mater. for soft sensors and actuators. Respons. Mater. 2026, 4, e70036.

56. Zheng, Z.; Li, Y.; Niu, J.; et al. Significantly (00l)-textured Ag2Se thin films with excellent thermoelectric performance for flexible power applications. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 21603-10.

57. Hu, J.; Zhu, J.; Guo, F.; et al. Electronic orbital alignment and hierarchical phonon scattering enabling high thermoelectric performance p-type Mg3Sb2 zintl compounds. Research 2022, 2022, 9842949.

58. Park, D.; Ju, H.; Kim, J. Enhanced thermoelectric power factor and low thermal conductivity in one-dimensional Te/Ag2Te composites. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11156-62.

59. Bharadwaj, S.; Ramasubramaniam, A.; Ram-Mohan, L. R. Lateral transition-metal dichalcogenide heterostructures for high efficiency thermoelectric devices. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 11750-9.

60. Oh, J. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Han, S. W.; et al. Chemically exfoliated transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based wearable thermoelectric generators. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1696-705.

61. Patil, B.; Bernini, C.; Marré, D.; Pellegrino, L.; Pallecchi, I. Ink-jet printing and drop-casting deposition of 2H-phase SnSe2 and WSe2 nanoflake assemblies for thermoelectric applications. Nanotechnology 2021, 33, 035302.

62. Guo, Y.; Dun, C.; Xu, J.; et al. Wearable thermoelectric devices based on au-decorated two-dimensional MoS2. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 33316-21.

63. Chen, K.; Luan, Q.; Liu, T.; Albinsson, B.; Hou, L. Semiconductor nanocrystals‐based triplet‐triplet annihilation photon‐upconversion: mechanism, materials and applications. Respons. Mater. 2024, 3, e20240030.

64. Li, J.; Shi, Q.; Röhr, J. A.; et al. Flexible 3D porous MoS2/CNTs Architectures with ZT of 0.17 at room temperature for wearable thermoelectric applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002508.

65. Shirakawa, H. The discovery of polyacetylene film: the dawning of an era of conducting polymers (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2574-80.

66. Heeger, A. J. Semiconducting and metallic polymers:  the fourth generation of polymeric materials. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001, 105, 8475-91.

67. Li, J.; Tang, X.; Li, H.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, Q. Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of hydrochloric acid-doped polyaniline. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 1153-8.

68. Yao, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; et al. The synergic regulation of conductivity and Seebeck coefficient in pure polyaniline by chemically changing the ordered degree of molecular chains. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 2634-40.

69. Yao, Q.; Chen, L.; Xu, X.; Wang, C. The High thermoelectric properties of conducting polyaniline with special submicron-fibre structure. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 522-3.

70. Cho, C.; Wallace, K. L.; Tzeng, P.; Hsu, J. H.; Yu, C.; Grunlan, J. C. Outstanding low temperature thermoelectric power factor from completely organic thin films enabled by multidimensional conjugated nanomaterials. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2016, 6, 1502168.

71. Liang, L.; Chen, G.; Guo, C. Polypyrrole nanostructures and their thermoelectric performance. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 380-6.

72. Zhao, X.; Xu, H.; Liu, Z. T.; Li, G.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Z. W. Designable polypyrrole pattern in hydrogel achieved by photo-controllable concentration of Fe3+ initiator. Smart. Mol. 2024, 2, e20240015.

73. Wang, J.; Cai, K.; Shen, S.; Yin, J. Preparation and thermoelectric properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polypyrrole composites. Synth. Met. 2014, 195, 132-6.

74. Park, H.; Kim, J. W.; Hong, S. Y.; et al. Microporous polypyrrole‐coated graphene foam for high‐performance multifunctional sensors and flexible supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1707013.

75. Song, H.; Cai, K.; Wang, J.; Shen, S. Influence of polymerization method on the thermoelectric properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polypyrrole composites. Synth. Met. 2016, 211, 58-65.

76. Groenendaal, L.; Jonas, F.; Freitag, D.; et al. Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and its derivatives: past, present, and future. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 481-94.

77. Hu, X.; Chen, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Tuning thermoelectric performance by nanostructure evolution of a conducting polymer. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015, 3, 20896-902.

78. Bubnova, O.; Khan, Z. U.; Malti, A.; et al. Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 429-33.

79. Kim, J.; Jung, J.; Lee, D.; Joo, J. Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents. Synth. Met. 2002, 126, 311-6.

80. Ouyang, J.; Xu, Q.; Chu, C.; Yang, Y.; Li, G.; Shinar, J. On the mechanism of conductivity enhancement in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) film through solvent treatment. Polymer 2004, 45, 8443-50.

81. Jönsson, S.; Birgerson, J.; Crispin, X.; et al. The effects of solvents on the morphology and sheet resistance in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrenesulfonic acid (PEDOT-PSS) films. Synth. Met. 2003, 139, 1-10.

82. Kee, S.; Kim, N.; Kim, B. S.; et al. Controlling molecular ordering in aqueous conducting polymers using ionic liquids. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8625-31.

83. Fan, Z.; Du, D.; Yao, H.; Ouyang, J. Higher PEDOT molecular weight giving rise to higher thermoelectric property of PEDOT:PSS: a comparative study of clevios p and clevios PH1000. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 11732-8.

84. Petsagkourakis, I.; Pavlopoulou, E.; Cloutet, E.; et al. Correlating the Seebeck coefficient of thermoelectric polymer thin films to their charge transport mechanism. Organic. Electronics. 2018, 52, 335-41.

85. Wei, Q.; Mukaida, M.; Kirihara, K.; Naitoh, Y.; Ishida, T. Thermoelectric power enhancement of PEDOT:PSS in high-humidity conditions. Appl. Phys. Express. 2014, 7, 031601.

86. Wang, H.; Ail, U.; Gabrielsson, R.; Berggren, M.; Crispin, X. Ionic Seebeck effect in conducting polymers. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2015, 5, 1500044.

87. Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Ni, Z.; Guo, C. Recent advances in preparation, thermoelectric properties, and applications of organic small molecule/SWCNT composites. Microstructures 2024, 4, 2024061.

88. Li, D.; Wu, G.; Wang, X.; Wu, J. R.; Yang, Y. W. [2]Biphenyl-extended pillar[6]arene functionalized silver nanoparticles for catalysis and label-free detection. Smart. Mol. 2023, 1, e20230016.

89. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Xie, B.; Yang, G.; Yin, Z.; Wu, H. Hoffmeister effect optimized hydrogel electrodes with enhanced electrical and mechanical properties for nerve conduction studies. Research 2024, 7, 0453.

90. Cohn, J. L.; Nolas, G. S.; Fessatidis, V.; Metcalf, T. H.; Slack, G. A. Glasslike heat conduction in high-mobility crystalline semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 779-82.

91. Weng, M.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, J.; et al. Multi-functional Nb4C3Tx (MXene)-bacterial cellulose composites for multimodal self-powered sensors toward a material/temperature recognition system. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 522, 167607.

92. Zhang, J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, H.; et al. Single-crystal SnSe thermoelectric fibers via laser-induced directional crystallization: from 1D fibers to multidimensional fabrics. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002702.

93. Chen, C.; Zhao, B.; Wang, R.; et al. Janus helical ribbon structure of ordered nanowire films for flexible solar thermoelectric devices. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2206364.

94. Zhao, Z.; Fu, H.; Tang, R.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, J. Failure mechanisms in flexible electronics. Int. J. Smart. Nano. Mater. 2023, 14, 510-65.

95. Li, J.; Meng, X.; Shen, Y.; et al. Design strategy of porous elastomer substrate and encapsulation for inorganic stretchable electronics. Int. J. Smart. Nano. Mater. 2024, 15, 330-47.

96. Gao, Y.; Xu, J.; Qu, S.; Li, Y.; Sukhorukov, G. B.; Shang, L. Mussel-inspired self-assembly of silver nanoclusters into multifunctional silver aerogels for enhanced catalytic and bactericidal applications. Exploration. 2025, 5, 20240034.

97. Zhou, S. W.; Yu, C.; Chen, M.; Shi, C. Y.; Gu, R.; Qu, D. H. Self-healing and shape-shifting polymers controlled by dynamic bonds. Smart. Mol. 2023, 1, e20220009.

98. Yang, B.; Zhu, X.; Peng, C.; et al. Synchronized measurement of electromechanical responses of fabric strain sensors under large deformation. Smart. Wearable. Technol. 2025, 1, A7.

99. Wang, X.; Liu, T.; Sun, F.; et al. Highly tough, crack-resistant and self-healable piezo-ionic skin enabled by dynamic hard domains with mechanosensitive ionic channel. Smart. Mol. 2024, 2, e20240008.

100. Na, Y.; Kim, S.; Mallem, S. P. R.; Yi, S.; Kim, K. T.; Park, K. Energy harvesting from human body heat using highly flexible thermoelectric generator based on Bi2Te3 particles and polymer composite. J. Alloys. Compd. 2022, 924, 166575.

101. Sun, T.; Zhou, B.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Snyder, G. J. Stretchable fabric generates electric power from woven thermoelectric fibers. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 572.

102. Lee, J. A.; Aliev, A. E.; Bykova, J. S.; et al. Woven-yarn thermoelectric textiles. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 5038-44.

103. Dai, Z.; Lei, M.; Ding, S.; et al. Durable superhydrophobic surface in wearable sensors: from nature to application. Exploration 2024, 4, 20230046.

104. Komatsu, N.; Ichinose, Y.; Dewey, O. S.; et al. Macroscopic weavable fibers of carbon nanotubes with giant thermoelectric power factor. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4931.

105. Li, C.; Wang, T.; Zhou, S.; et al. Deep learning model coupling wearable bioelectric and mechanical sensors for refined muscle strength assessment. Research 2024, 7, 0366.

106. He, X.; Gu, J.; Hao, Y.; et al. Continuous manufacture of stretchable and integratable thermoelectric nanofiber yarn for human body energy harvesting and self-powered motion detection. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 137937.

107. Fu, S.; Cheng, X.; Liu, J.; et al. An ultra-stretchable fiber sensor with high linearity and durability via thermal drawing. Int. J. Smart. Nano. Mater. 2024, 16, 144-59.

108. Zhang, T.; Li, K.; Zhang, J.; et al. High-performance, flexible, and ultralong crystalline thermoelectric fibers. Nano. Energy. 2017, 41, 35-42.

109. Xu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xie, E.; et al. A flexible, large-scale sensing array with low-power in-sensor intelligence. Research 2024, 7, 0497.

110. Ren, H.; Li, W.; Ding, Y.; et al. Flexible tactile sensors for enhancing robotic perception. Smart. Wearable. Technol. 2025, 1, A2.

111. Zhang, P.; Wang, G.; Yu, H. Ultraviolet‐visible‐near‐infrared light‐responsive soft materials: fabrication, photomechanical deformation and applications. Respons. Mater. 2024, 2, e20240016.

112. Wei, L.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Multifunctional PHC bandage for accelerated wound healing in movable parts. Exploration. 2025, 5, 20230176.

113. Nan, K.; Kang, S. D.; Li, K.; et al. Compliant and stretchable thermoelectric coils for energy harvesting in miniature flexible devices. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaau5849.

114. Chen, C.; Wang, R.; Li, X. L.; et al. Structural design of nanowire wearable stretchable thermoelectric generator. Nano. Lett. 2022, 22, 4131-6.

115. Lu, Y.; Qu, X.; Zhao, W.; et al. Highly stretchable, elastic, and sensitive MXene-based hydrogel for flexible strain and pressure sensors. Research. 2020, 2020, 2038560.

116. Chiba, S.; Waki, M. The potential of wearable systems using dielectric elastomers (DE). Smart. Wearable. Technol. 2025, 1, A3.

117. Zhu, P.; Shi, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Recyclable, healable, and stretchable high‐power thermoelectric generator. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2100920.

118. Kim, S.; Hyeon, D. Y.; Ham, S. S.; et al. Synergetic enhancement of the energy harvesting performance in flexible hybrid generator driven by human body using thermoelectric and piezoelectric combine effects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 558, 149784.

119. Kim, S. J.; We, J. H.; Cho, B. J. A wearable thermoelectric generator fabricated on a glass fabric. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1959.

120. Sargolzaeiaval, Y.; Padmanabhan Ramesh, V.; Neumann, T. V.; et al. Flexible thermoelectric generators for body heat harvesting - enhanced device performance using high thermal conductivity elastomer encapsulation on liquid metal interconnects. Appl. Energy. 2020, 262, 114370.

121. Yuan, J.; Zhu, R. A fully self-powered wearable monitoring system with systematically optimized flexible thermoelectric generator. Appl. Energy. 2020, 271, 115250.

122. Xu, Q.; Deng, B.; Zhang, L.; et al. High-performance, flexible thermoelectric generator based on bulk materials. Cell. Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100780.

123. Liang, J.; Wang, T.; Qiu, P.; et al. Flexible thermoelectrics: from silver chalcogenides to full-inorganic devices. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2983-90.

124. Jeon, J.; Bukharina, D.; Kim, M.; et al. Tunable and responsive photonic bio‐inspired materials and their applications. Respons. Mater. 2024, 2, e20230032.

125. Kumar, S.; Battabyal, M.; Satapathy, D. K. Flexible Ag2Se film with enhanced thermoelectric performance. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 66170-80.

126. Chen, W.; Shi, X. L.; Li, M.; et al. Nanobinders advance screen-printed flexible thermoelectrics. Science 2024, 386, 1265-71.

127. Yi, N.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Multi‐functional Ti3C2Tx‐silver@silk nanofiber composites with multi‐dimensional heterogeneous structure for versatile wearable electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 35, 2412307.

128. Zhang, L.; Qin, P.; Ying, H.; et al. A 3.55-µm Ultrathin, skin-like mechanoresponsive, compliant, and seamless ionic conductive electrode for epidermal electrophysiological signal acquisition and human-machine interaction. Exploration 2025, 5, 20240232.

129. Lee, J. H.; Hong, K. I.; Choi, W. H.; Kim, Y.; Jang, W. D. Triazole-bearing oligo(ethylene glycol)-strapped zinc porphyrins as dual mode ion-binding receptors. Smart. Mol. 2023, 1, e20220004.

Cite This Article

Review
Open Access
Flexible thermoelectric generators for wearable energy harvesting and applications

How to Cite

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Export Citation File:

Type of Import

Tips on Downloading Citation

This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.

Citation Manager File Format

Use the radio buttons to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex.

Type of Import

If you have citation management software installed on your computer your Web browser should be able to import metadata directly into your reference database.

Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.

Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.

About This Article

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of OAE and/or the editor(s). OAE and/or the editor(s) disclaim any responsibility for harm to persons or property resulting from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
© The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
72
Downloads
2
Citations
0
Comments
0
0

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

0
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Microstructures
ISSN 2770-2995 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/