REFERENCES
1. Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, et al. Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:148-58.
2. Arjomandi Rad A, Vardanyan R, Athanasiou T, Maessen J, Sardari Nia P. The ethical considerations of integrating artificial intelligence into surgery: a review. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40:ivae192.
3. Gumbs AA, Frigerio I, Spolverato G, et al. Artificial intelligence surgery: How do we get to autonomous actions in surgery? Sensors. 2021;21:5526.
4. Lee A, Baker TS, Bederson JB, Rapoport BI. Levels of autonomy in FDA-cleared surgical robots: a systematic review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:103.
5. Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot. 2022;7:eabj2908.
6. Kim JWB, Chen JT, Hansen P, et al. SRT-H: a hierarchical framework for autonomous surgery via language-conditioned imitation learning. Sci Robot. 2025;10:eadt5254.
7. Haworth J, Chen JT, Nelson N, et al. SutureBot: a precision framework & benchmark for autonomous end-to-end suturing. NeurIPS. 2025. Available from: https://neurips.cc/virtual/2025/poster/121650. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2026].
8. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD; New Collective Author. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum. 2000;30:286-97.
9. Haidegger T. Autonomy for surgical robots: concepts and paradigms. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2019;1:65-76.
10. Yang GZ, Cambias J, Cleary K, et al. Medical robotics - regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy. Sci Robot. 2017;2:eaam8638.
11. Opfermann JD, Schmidgall S, Krieger A. State-of-art and the future of autonomous surgery. In: Hung AJ, Editors. Artificial Intelligence in Urology. 2025; pp. 249-73.
12. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. List of artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-enabled-medical-devices. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2026].
13. Loftus TJ, Altieri MS, Balch JA, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled decision support in surgery: state-of-the-art and future directions. Ann Surg. 2023;278:51-8.
14. Reinke A, Li ZO, Tizabi MD, et al. Current validation practice undermines surgical AI development. arXiv 2025;arXiv:2511.03769. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.03769 [accessed 13 October 2026].
15. Limon D, Satish V, Raghavan N, Nguyen P, Rajesh A. Artificial intelligence in surgery revisited: a 2025 guide to understanding and applying AI models in clinical practice. Am Surg. 2026;92:687-97.
16. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268:70-6.
17. De Simone B, Deeken G, Catena F. Balancing ethics and innovation: Can artificial intelligence safely transform emergency surgery? A narrative perspective. J Clin Med. 2025;14:3111.
18. Marcus HJ, Ramirez PT, Khan DZ, et al. ; Additional collaborators. The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring. Nat Med. 2024;30:61-75.
19. Brattain LJ, Pierce TT, Gjesteby LA, et al. AI-enabled, ultrasound-guided handheld robotic device for femoral vascular access. Biosensors. 2021;11:522.
20. Herlihy JP, Cohn WE, Ebner A. Centrally inserted central catheter placement using a novel, handheld, image-guided, robotic device: Results of initial feasibility trial in patients. J Vasc Access. 2025;26:2027-34.
21. Grunhut J, Walker P, Lackie M, Patterson K, Driscoll K, Sarkar R. Autonomous vascular access devices: current solutions and future challenges. Mil Med. 2026:usag377.
22. Schmidgall S, Opfermann JD, Kim JW, Krieger A. Will your next surgeon be a robot? Autonomy and AI in robotic surgery. Sci Robot. 2025;10:eadt0187.
23. Zhang R, Chen J, Wang Z, et al. A step towards conditional autonomy - robotic appendectomy. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2023;8:2429-36.
24. Schüßler A, Kunz C, Younis R, et al. Semi-autonomous robotic assistance for gallbladder retraction in surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2025;10:7468-75.
25. Shademan A, Decker RS, Opfermann JD, Leonard S, Krieger A, Kim PCW. Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:337ra64.
27. Long Y, Lin A, Kwok DHC, et al. Surgical embodied intelligence for generalized task autonomy in laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery. Sci Robot. 2025;10:eadt3093.
28. Schmidgall S, Kim JW, Kuntz A, Ghazi AE, Krieger A. General-purpose foundation models for increased autonomy in robot-assisted surgery. Nat Mach Intell. 2024;6:1275-83.
29. Liu T, Yuan S, Ren H. Artificial kinaesthesia in autonomous robotic surgery. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2026;4:210-1.
30. Li Y, Richter F, Lu J, et al. SuPer: a surgical perception framework for endoscopic tissue manipulation with surgical robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020;5:2294-301.
31. Lin S, Miao AJ, Alabiad A, et al. SuPerPM: a surgical perception framework based on deep point matching learned from physical constrained simulation data. arXiv 2025;arXiv:2309.13863. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.13863 [accessed 13 October 2026].
32. Liang X, Liu F, Zhang Y, Li Y, Lin S, Yip M. Real-to-sim deformable object manipulation: optimizing physics models with residual mappings for robotic surgery. arXiv 2024;arXiv:2309.11656. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11656 [accessed 13 October 2026].
33. Ge J, Kilmer E, Mady LJ, Opfermann JD, Krieger A. Enhancing surgical precision in autonomous robotic incisions via physics-based tissue cutting simulation. 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2024 Oct 14-18; Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. IEEE; 2024. pp. 2421-8.
34. Ou Y, Tavakoli M. Sim-to-real surgical robot learning and autonomous planning for internal tissue points manipulation using reinforcement learning. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2023;8:2502-9.
35. Yu Q, Moghani M, Dharmarajan K, et al. Orbit-surgical: an open-simulation framework for learning surgical augmented dexterity. arXiv 2024;arXiv:2404.16027. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.16027 [accessed 13 October 2026].
36. Ho YJ, Chiu ZY, Zhi Y, Yip MC. SurgIRL: towards life-long learning for surgical automation by incremental reinforcement learning. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2025;10:13145-52.
37. Liang X, Wang CP, Shinde NU, Liu F, Richter F, Yip M. MEDiC: autonomous surgical robotic assistance to maximizing exposure for dissection and cautery. arXiv 2024;arXiv:2409.14287. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.14287 [accessed 13 October 2026].
38. Wang J, Yao M, Wei Y, Guo X, Zheng A, Zhao W. Image-to-force estimation for soft tissue interaction in robotic-assisted surgery using structured light. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2025;10:7795-802.
39. Reyzabal MDI, Chen M, Huang W, Ourselin S, Liu H. DaFoEs: mixing datasets towards the generalization of vision-state deep-learning force estimation in minimally invasive robotic surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2024;9:2527-34.
40. Mazidi A, Roshanfar M, Sayadi A, et al. Learning-based force sensing and impedance matching for safe haptic feedback in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. arXiv 2026;arXiv:2601.14445. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.14445 [accessed 13 October 2026].
41. Liu T, Zhang T, Katupitiya J, Wang J, Wu L. Haptics-enabled forceps with multimodal force sensing: toward task-autonomous surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2024;29:2208-19.
42. Amodei D, Olah C, Steinhardt J, Christiano P, Schulman J, Mané D. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv 2016;arXiv:1606.06565. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565 [accessed 13 October 2026].
43. Vasey B, Lippert KA, Khan DZ, et al. Intraoperative applications of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery: a scoping review of current development stages and levels of autonomy. Ann Surg. 2023;278:896-903.
44. Guzman NM, Marwaha JS, Keller DS, et al. Regulating digital surgery to balance safety and innovation: a SAGES white paper. Surg Endosc. 2026;40:5480-90.
45. Kelkar D, Borse MA, Godbole GP, Kurlekar U, Slack M. Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020;35:5193-202.
46. Fraser AG, Buccheri S, Byrne RA, et al. Recommended methodologies for clinical investigations of high-risk medical devices - conclusions from the European Union CORE-MD Project. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025;58:101460.
47. Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, Perrenot C, Felblinger J, Hubert J. Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer® simulator. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2569-76.
48. Richter F, Shen S, Liu F, et al. Autonomous robotic suction to clear the surgical field for hemostasis using image-based blood flow detection. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2021;6:1383-90.
49. Liang Z, Liang X, Atar S, et al. LapSurgie: humanoid robots performing surgery via teleoperated handheld laparoscopy. arXiv 2026;arXiv:2510.03529. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.03529 [accessed 13 October 2026].
50. Hashimoto DA, Marwaha JS, Lee SA, Schwaitzberg S, Duffourc MN. Risk and liability in the deployment of AI systems for surgery: a SAGES white paper. Surg Endosc. 2026;40:5468-79.
51. Subramanian T, Pocivavsek L, Alverdy JC. To operate or not? Balancing advanced imaging, machine learning, and the doctor-patient relationship in complex clinical decision making. Acad Med. 2023;98:S34-6.
52. Lee EA. Cyber physical systems: design challenges. UC Berkeley EECS Department Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2008-8; 2008. Available from: https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2008/EECS-2008-8.html. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2026].
53. Aboy M, Crespo C, Stern A. Beyond the 510(k): the regulation of novel moderate-risk medical devices, intellectual property considerations, and innovation incentives in the FDA’s De Novo pathway. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:29.
54. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence-enabled device software functions. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/marketing-submission-recommendations-predetermined-change-control-plan-artificial-intelligence. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2026].
55. Dabek PA, Bourgeois FT, Stern AD, Zhu Y, Everhart AO. Use and public reporting of predetermined change control plans for AI-enabled medical devices. JAMA Health Forum. 2026;7:e261204.
56. Cha JS, Fuller P, Ball M, Samreen S, Sylla P, Stefanidis D. ; SAGES Robotic Committee. SAGES tool for assessing robotic surgery systems (STARSS). Surg Endosc. 2025;39:5479-91.
57. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 50.24 - Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-50/subpart-B/section-50.24. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2026].
